 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-06-2020, 11:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in size on 1940 Playball
I have a question. I recently bought a 1940 playball card that was given a PSA numerical grade, but on inspection it is 1/32" too small left to right as well as top to bottom. Does anyone know if this is an acceptable variation in size for this issue? It is returnable and has me wondering. I'd rather not post a picture to avoid ruffling any feathers prior to a return, but to my eye (under magnification) I don't see any evidence of trimming. I only have one other card from this set (which is how I noticed the difference), so I don't know if slight variation is common or suspect. Thanks a lot in advance for any replies.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 size variation | CardMD | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-28-2017 08:53 PM |
| Size Variation of 1953 Bowman Color | Wichita | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 12-20-2011 11:25 AM |
| M101-2's - size variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-18-2006 09:48 AM |
| How come with every size variation, the smaller card always has sharper corners? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 01-21-2002 05:01 PM |
| Card Size Variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-19-2001 08:40 PM |
Threaded Mode