 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9
01-18-2019, 08:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
For example, here is an OJ I recently got that I'm sure would get an AUTH if I sent it in to be graded. The back is kind of a mess, and it's partially skinned at the bottom. Yet look at that image! I love it, and I certainly wouldn't trade this card for some SGC 50 card with a faded image but sharp corners.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CollectorFocus Image Quality | mintacular | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-13-2012 09:15 AM |
| E-Card Image Quality Rankings | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-13-2009 01:18 PM |
| '53 Bowman Reese image quality | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-28-2007 08:57 AM |
| Size Matters! Plow Boy | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-11-2005 06:33 AM |
| Size Matters? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 01-14-2004 11:42 AM |
Threaded Mode