Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
What on earth are you talking about? What better proof of materiality than from the very guy who bought the card not knowing the information?
|
right what on earth am i talking about. If there was a trial on a 1952 Mantle being doctored and reholdered, you think the judge would allow that guy (the poster that bought the dimaggio) on the jury? I think he would be considered biased. People have disagreed with you that had nothing to do with the actuall card that was bought or sold.
i just value the opinions more of people that werent actually involved about the transaction being a scam or not. As far as what facts occured, yes, I would want to know it from the people that actually were involved in the transaction.