![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Monday update: Yes, vintage penny sleeves used on the cards before putting them in the Pro Mold's does solve the movement issue. It's not the most elegant solution in the world, but it works and the finished product doesn't look all that different than a BVG slab with the type of sleeve they use. The penny sleeves I have for the vintage cards are actually a tad bigger than the recessed area of the Pro Mold case, but if you are careful to center the card going in and make sure that the card itself does not land outside of the recessed area before applying the screwdriver, you will be fine. The resulting pressure on the case when closed is not sufficient enough to indent the sleeve or cause any additional strain on the card. Honestly I think for run-of-the mill cards they will probably look cleaner in a toploader with the sleeve, but I like the idea of the rigidity and UV protection provided by the Pro Mold...(if nothing much else about the case). At least for the likes of Mantle, Robinson, and Mays. Will see how it goes. If I get this home and decide I hate it in a day, I do finally have plenty of properly-sized top-loaders now... -John
__________________
Prewar Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 02-06-2017 at 02:26 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cases | mwbeatles | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 08-02-2016 10:03 AM |
Cases | mwbeatles | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 07-29-2016 04:00 PM |
New SGC cases? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-11-2007 05:33 AM |
Tampered cases | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 11-04-2005 12:26 PM |
display cases | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-09-2005 05:36 PM |