 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
07-08-2016, 10:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
1. Grading is inherently subjective
2. Grading standards evolve with the hobby 3. Graders can differ and often change Many old school PSA and SGC slabs contain cards that would not be graded today; so crack at your own risk. Grading evolves with condition preferences of collectors and authenticators are much more cognizant of potential alterations or sizing issues. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do grading companies punish for printing errors? | Louieman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-12-2014 10:35 AM |
| Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
| Mint Grading, or is it the grading of mints? | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-30-2010 09:11 AM |
| Looking for double names, miscuts, printing errors, proofs, ghost, errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 08-19-2008 03:03 PM |
| GAI Grading errors/problems | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 04-22-2006 10:48 AM |
Threaded Mode