 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9
06-12-2016, 08:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Glue Residue
I looks like SGC is matching PSA's policy of low grades for cards soaked out of a scrapbook. If they detect a little glue residue or sticky substance they are extremely harsh on the grading.
It's interesting that SGC is super harsh on any paper loss on the back of a card. PSA is super harsh on an ink mark or pencil indentation on the back, or a card with tiny wrinkles. I would say that many collectors love a card that is beautiful on the front and well centered, like that Pastorious T206 which is awesome! Too bad SGC and PSA aren't more focused on the condition of the front. They should take into account the overall condition instead of marking off for minor flaws. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SGC vs. PSA vs. BVG for card grading | Rascal1010 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 03-02-2016 09:20 PM |
| Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
| Card Grading... | Tim206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 07-16-2011 05:02 PM |
| When will Grading Card Co.'s Consider.. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-10-2007 09:51 AM |
| SGC grading of this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 55 | 02-02-2006 11:36 AM |
Threaded Mode