Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyo
I've never even considered "poor" to mean "it could be trimmed"
Do others (beside Luke... I read your comments and consider them valid) really believe this? Comes as a bit of surprise to me.
I wasn't aware of this. If true, I'll never question that again as I'm all about written rules.
|
Hi Tony - I say this in the sense that there is really nowhere to go from 'Poor'. It is the bottom of the barrel. Most definitions of a card in Poor condition cover cards that are in terrible condition and trimmed cards would be part of that, no matter what the rest of the card looks like. Any raw card that is trimmed is considered a 'Poor' card.
Grading companies have muddied things up a bit by grading trimmed cards 'Authentic'. But in terms of the grading scale for raw cards, there's not really a level below Poor. So to me, and others, I'm sure, a trimmed card is automatically a Poor one. I should add that if the card is known or even believed to be trimmed, the seller should state that. But as others have pointed out, it's not a slam dunk and some cards just measure short. Since it's not a clear cut case (unless the seller knows and isn't clarifying), I think the description was a reasonable one.
__________________
T205 (208/208)
T206 (520/520)
T207 (200/200)
E90-1 (120/121)
E91A/B/C (99/99)
1895 Mayo (18/48)
N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100)
N162 Goodwin Champions (32/50)
N184 Kimball Champions (38/50)
Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225
www.prewarcollector.com
Last edited by Cozumeleno; 03-20-2016 at 06:23 PM.
|
03-20-2016, 06:19 PM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode