![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Through the 50s and 60s Topps often used the same photos over and over. There have been some good articles, including some by Olberman, about why that happened in some cases. Money in one way or another was the main reason. Later, Marvin Miller ( plus money again) another
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Suggestions for some visually appealing non-RC HoF | ThePumaLives | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 01-07-2016 06:37 AM |
Griffey Rookie Year Signature | Luke | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 14 | 03-11-2015 12:18 AM |
Rookie of the Year Projections | Runscott | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 9 | 09-04-2014 09:40 AM |
Monster aficionados, which 5 cards from the set do you find most visually appealing? | the 'stache | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 09-14-2013 06:11 AM |
Most visually appealing sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 06-23-2005 09:22 AM |