 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8
01-15-2016, 02:43 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I find the appearance of a multi-player rookie card vs their second year card would fit this category.
1969 Topps Nolan Ryan > 1968 Topps One that people do not mention is the Steve Carlton. I like the pitching pose of the 1966 card vs the multi-player rookie card of him. Plus there are many others: Like what was mentioned the Rose, Munson, Schmidt etc.
__________________
Excellent people to deal with: bnorth, Republicaninmass, obcmac, marcdelpercio, Michael Peich, dougscats, jimivintage, mybuddyinc, Luke, Bocabirdman, ncinin. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Suggestions for some visually appealing non-RC HoF | ThePumaLives | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 01-07-2016 06:37 AM |
| Griffey Rookie Year Signature | Luke | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 14 | 03-11-2015 12:18 AM |
| Rookie of the Year Projections | Runscott | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 9 | 09-04-2014 09:40 AM |
| Monster aficionados, which 5 cards from the set do you find most visually appealing? | the 'stache | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 09-14-2013 06:11 AM |
| Most visually appealing sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 06-23-2005 09:22 AM |
Threaded Mode