![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think if you randomly picked ten T206 cards in PSA 7 and ten T206 cards in SGC 84/7, and cracked them all out of their slabs, and sent them all to PSA, I'd think you'd find a significant number in both samples that would receive a grade lower than 7. I think the grading standards at PSA have gotten tougher in general where it can be more difficult to get cards in higher graded slabs than in the past. Saying that however, every collector who buys cards should look at the card before looking at the grade first. Think about how you think the raw card should grade, and then determine if the grade it did receive merited it. If you have a card that is strong for it's grade in an SGC holder, I would say that it would almost certainly cross over to PSA at that same grade or better.
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scary | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 08-04-2011 10:50 AM |
Looked Very Scary to me... | Northviewcats | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-28-2011 12:37 PM |
SGC problem - Scary for me | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 01-14-2008 08:08 AM |
Pretty scary.................. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-23-2006 03:30 PM |
this is scary | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-02-2005 01:38 PM |