![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wouldn't say anonymous backs are more desirable, though they are relatively rare. Cycles are more popular...probably because they look neat. They are about equal to Anon-3's (within the broadleaf/cycle class), with Anon 25's being much more difficult. (All based on Tim Newcomb's numbers). Only the master set guys get excited about the anon backs...though they are often paired with desirable fronts.
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about Anonymous brown ink T207 back | marcdelpercio | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-06-2010 05:55 PM |
T207 Anonymous Factory 3 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-28-2008 11:49 PM |
T207 with Anonymous Back | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 05-14-2008 10:11 PM |
WTB T207 Anonymous 3 Backs | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-01-2008 10:43 AM |
T207 Anonymous back questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-06-2007 05:04 PM |