![]() |
T207 anonymous?
Are anonymous backs more desirable than other backs on T207's?
Thanks Chad |
Hi Chad,
good to text with you earlier. Anonymous backs are more rare than Recruits backs and probably about the same in rareness as Broadleaf but not as rare as Cycle backs. Value really depends on the card and obviously there are some fairly rare cards in T207. Hope this helps. Ken |
I wouldn't say anonymous backs are more desirable, though they are relatively rare. Cycles are more popular...probably because they look neat. They are about equal to Anon-3's (within the broadleaf/cycle class), with Anon 25's being much more difficult. (All based on Tim Newcomb's numbers). Only the master set guys get excited about the anon backs...though they are often paired with desirable fronts.
|
Anonymous-ness
Hi Chad,
Agree with the previous posters, and will say there are several levels of distinction. It mostly depends on the card and the grade, the relative interest in any specific card will vary widely ... this is very much a case of the card specifics. That said, a little generalization ... the "T207 anonymous backs" have a couple of groups:
General observations over the last few years:
As voiced by others, no one cares much about the subtleties as they're scarce enough to have little interest, beyond those of us that are obsessed, (or have been possessed), My opinions and terminology may or may not be shared by other T207 collectors - once you get into the weeds, it gets murky... That said, its fun to review what's known and hypothesize about various things that may have happened. There's much less general chatter about T207 than T206, for reasons that are pretty clear, I think. Best, Mike |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:12 AM. |