 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18
08-19-2014, 07:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Here is one for you Steve.
When reviewing the SLs PSA pop report totals there is some interesting data showing up. I broke the 48 SLs up into two groups, the 34 printed with OM/Pied/Hindu & the 14 printed with OM/Piedmont. The 34 group has an average ratio of .76 Piedmonts per OM printed (51%-103%) The 14 group has an average ratio of 1.6 Piedmonts per OM printed (140%-221%) Those 14 show up on average more than double with Piedmonts than the other 34 group. Based on the pop numbers it appears that those 14 SLs were printed at one point (or always) separately than the 34. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Topics for discussion re: t206 Printing and errors | Clark7781 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 04-17-2012 09:38 PM |
| T206 Backs Discussion, Part 215,256,559 | usernamealreadytaken | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-16-2010 07:31 PM |
| E cards - what size sheet to store raw? | tiger8mush | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-16-2010 12:46 PM |
| T206 Printing Discussion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-21-2007 06:01 AM |
| For Discussion: Relative Values of T206 and T205 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-02-2006 09:57 AM |
Threaded Mode