 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
07-26-2012, 11:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
What makes this card a printers scrap? I can see that it might be missing a color and has evidence of a ghost overprint. Are these not sometimes found as print anomaly's or bad quality control in the mass production of t206? It appears to be well worn like a card someone had in a time period collection that was acquired via normal "pack" insert. Just a sh*&%y copy. I like the card but when do the assumptions that a really bad quality print anomaly card must be a scrap begin or end?
GB 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: MISC T206 T3's | grandslamcardscria | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 07-04-2010 02:29 PM |
| Wtb: T206 printer scrap | mrvster | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 11-13-2009 10:31 AM |
| Lets see your T206 scrap | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-22-2009 08:35 PM |
| t206 Kruger and Weimer Ghost, Scrap, Common, ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-18-2009 04:51 PM |
| t206 "brown/yellow" printer scrap - players? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 11-03-2002 09:24 PM |
Threaded Mode