 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22
07-18-2012, 11:31 AM
|
||||
|
||||
The other problem from a TPG perspective with downgrading is that I would imagine they would be liable for the difference in value in the card by downgrading since it would have been their mistake. Unless the error is egregious I doubt there would be an inclination to downgrade.
And I agree with Barry that since most people would only be submitting cards they feel are high end for the grade anyway, the likelihood of legitimately necessitating downgrade is slim. In terms of numbers, lets say they get the grade right 98% of the time. Among the 2%, let's say some deserve upgrades and some deserve downgrades. My guess is that it is highly unlikely that the ones that really ought to be downgraded will get submitted with the hope of an upgrade very often. JimB 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1960 Topps SGC - all graded 84 or higher | Irwin Fletcher | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 05-07-2012 08:14 PM |
| SGC grading question | h2oya311 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-19-2011 07:57 AM |
| The Oaks Show and SGC Grading | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 83 | 11-25-2011 05:00 PM |
| SGC Grading Question | magic1313 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 04-01-2010 07:12 AM |
| Please explain sgc grading | Merrillstoys | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 03-21-2010 03:29 PM |
Threaded Mode