![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: fkw
Ya I agree the card in the auction has the characteristics of a reprint (from what Ive always known). Has anyone ever seen a wide gape authentic card?? I only own a handful from this issue (type cards) and all mine and everyone Ive seen lately have thin gaps. Todd your good, I see the Bender is reallly a M101-4 from 1916, and yet another PSA vintage card identification screw up. Frank |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another M101-5/4 question. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-15-2008 10:37 PM |
Question re: Ruth M101-4/M101-5 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-08-2007 07:08 PM |
M101-2 Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-25-2006 09:38 PM |
Question regarding M101-4 and M101-5 sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-08-2005 05:37 PM |
M101-7 question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-19-2002 07:12 PM |