 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12
12-15-2023, 08:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I think the reason is that to make a great fake you'd need an original as source material.
And it's become so expensive that it just hasn't happened. It would be worth it to make one nearly perfect one. maybe a bit off, so it's not suspicious, but around a 7-8. what it would take is out of reach for most fakers. Someone smart would only do that once. Maybe with a handful of other 52 high numbers to avert suspicion. Two? It would start getting looked at more closely. Three? Just asking for trouble. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1952 Bowman Mantle...this current bidding can't be real, can it? | thatkidfromjerrymaguire | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 45 | 02-28-2021 07:31 AM |
| 1952 Topps Preacher Roe #66 - Real or Reprint?? | weilervintage | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 02-04-2016 02:43 PM |
| ***REPRINT*** 1952 topps mantle, old, looks feels real | soxfan1986 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 20 | 12-21-2013 10:06 PM |
| 1952 Topps Mantle Real???? | Tcards-Please | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 03-13-2010 11:27 PM |
| 1952 Topps Mantle REAL? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 11-30-2008 03:10 AM |
Threaded Mode