![]() |
1952 topps Mantle how can this be real
seller has only one card for sale
looks really suspect , how can this be real prefectly centered and ungraded https://www.ebay.com/itm/40468013135...UAAOSw-sJlekcZ |
….Because it’s fake.
|
The tell is the back corners, natural wear doesn't look like that
|
|
I'm honestly surprised we don't have many good fakes of this card yet. Especially with it's price run the last three years, we mostly see fakes that are not even remotely close and can be dismissed in two seconds.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There are definitely some that are pretty good and require the expert or some real research to tell. The graders refuse/refused to grade Star basketball and Fro-Joys because there were some decent fakes. I've seen some pretty good Fleer MJ's and some decent Exhibits. I don't think I've ever seen a fake Mantle that requires more than a 5 second glance at an image to tell it's a fake though. It's fakes I've seen are all very low effort jobs that are immediately wrong. It wouldn't be that difficult of a project to make one that at least looks pretty decent with a vaguely close stock in a picture. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
and many Star Basketball from the same era |
Quote:
|
The negative feedback calling the seller a "scumbag" may give reason for pause. LOL
|
Quote:
The best fake I ever saw was back in maybe 81 or 82. The local dealer showed me a really great 51 Mantle. And just asked me what I thought of it. (pretty amazing they'd ask a just out of HS kid that) After the initial "wow that's incredibly nice" the doubt set in. I couldn't point to anything specifically, but I became sure it was fake. So that's what I said, It's nice, but it's sad that it's fake. but I don't know why. Apparently that was their opinion, and the opinion of I think 5 other dealers who had been offered that same card. Being pessimistic, I would almost bet it's gotten past PSA and is now in a holder that's at least an 8. |
I think the reason is that to make a great fake you'd need an original as source material.
And it's become so expensive that it just hasn't happened. It would be worth it to make one nearly perfect one. maybe a bit off, so it's not suspicious, but around a 7-8. what it would take is out of reach for most fakers. Someone smart would only do that once. Maybe with a handful of other 52 high numbers to avert suspicion. Two? It would start getting looked at more closely. Three? Just asking for trouble. |
Quote:
I could see some of the more sinister elements of our hobby deciding to go scorched earth and create millions of really good 52T fakes. If done properly, it could throw the entire hobby in disarray for a while, at least until we figured out some way to reliably distinguish the fakes from the real deal. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Up to $12k!
Seller says he will put the card in a toploader for shipment LOL. |
1952 topps Mantle how can this be real
I’ve often wondered about this. With the exponential leaps in AI effectiveness we’ve seen in the last few years, how long would it really take for someone to start creating fakes that are so good they couldn’t be detected using some of those same concepts?
I guess a better question is would this happen to money (counterfeit) first? There is a reason over hundreds of years now that hasn’t happened, and maybe not just one. For cards, I think the cost-benefit to do this en masse just isn’t there yet. Could someone in theory invest in the infrastructure to create a printing factory that uses the old school techniques, (halftone dot printing…) old materials, and old cutting methods? Yes. If and when this does happen, and the market is suddenly flooded with minty, perfectly centered Mickey Mantle cards that are indistinguishable from those already in PSA 8+ slabs - what happens? Do the legitimately worn, and OC copies suddenly become more valuable because they are more easily identifiable as authentic? LOL. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Quote:
Not to mention, couldn’t your model (for example) just be a common ‘52 Topps card and not the Mantle? Maybe not, I don’t know but either way having one to produce profit on many doesn’t seem to me something that would stand in the way for long. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Quote:
The problem most fakers have is that they're mostly lazy. The effort to get a top quality fake is a lot but the reward would be too. On the other hand, using a cheap fake takes no effort, and apparently gets you thousands. It's also in the range of just refunding if it gets caught, and a couple thousand probably won't be investigated. Because at that point "I didn't know" just might be all you need. A couple million or more might cause the faker a lot more trouble. |
whoops, nevermind.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:29 PM. |