|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Leon, in your opinion, why should T cards issued between 1909-11, with same t206 fronts, including black lettering, not be included as t206s? Specifically I am talking about T213-1 and T215–1. What makes these cards any less a T206 than American Beauties, other than they were not initially classified as such?
I am very open to opinions, but merely calling a stance hogwash is not evidence/persuasive. I know there are others threads and plenty of arguments, but why specifically do you think t213-1 and t215-1 are not t206s (besides initial classification)? Thanks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 SGC to PSA Question | NYYFan63 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 09-15-2018 05:39 PM |
| Oh No! Not another T206 Question! | iggyman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 12-02-2011 10:47 AM |
| T206.org question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-26-2007 07:17 PM |
| T206 question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 12-26-2005 01:51 PM |
| T206/HOF question? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-22-2001 09:16 PM |