 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32
02-17-2019, 08:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
DJ, theory 1 sounds plausible for sure, but as Ted (and others will argue), the E102 actually came out in 1909-1910 (not 1908), by virtue of Cobb’s center field designation. Theory 2 is interesting, but do you think they really viewed a young and then-very-unproven Joe Jackson as “pose threat” to the great Ty Cobb? Regardless, both theories are interesting and I definitely think 1 has real merit and 2 is at worst intriguing. Thanks for thoughts.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: e92 Crofts Candy | wayne97 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 12-29-2016 12:19 PM |
| WTB: E92 Crofts Cocoa/Crofts Candy | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 07-15-2007 08:11 AM |
| Crofts Candy VS. Crofts Cocoa | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-26-2007 08:34 PM |
| what is rarer..crofts cocoa or crofts candy blue backs? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-19-2007 05:33 AM |
| E92 Crofts Candy PSA 8 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 03-13-2005 12:32 PM |
Threaded Mode