|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
The ganley is the one that can most be argued is under graded, however the type of wear is different in my opinion. I hate judging scans and i may feel different in person. The Johnson is more worn where as the Ganley is more bumped and folded corner wise. Again I am going from a scan and could feel different in person. PS I think that line may be the culprit. I honestly could be seeing it wrong but both bottom corners look to have those mild corner creases. i could be seeing things but thats what I saw to justify the grades. I would not argue if they were all the same either but one grade difference when not in hand and I think I may see something, I will usually figure Lummy got it right and I just feel the lower right is more rounded yet less worn than the johnson lower left. Its one of those grading sometimes different than eye appeal things. I honestly feel McBride and Clymer are clearly worse.
Last edited by glynparson; 10-08-2014 at 11:01 AM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Card grading ?'s | GrayGhost | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-04-2014 10:49 AM |
| Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 01:52 PM |
| When will Grading Card Co.'s Consider.. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-10-2007 10:51 AM |
| see, now this is why you do need card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-29-2005 05:24 PM |
| Card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-21-2002 09:58 PM |