![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#151
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Tom, |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tom Boblitt
in some cases, more things you can do to a 3 to get a 4 than the other. BUT.....again......the reward isn't exponentially greater like it is on the high end stuff. I'm sure that, within every segment of cards, there are cards that have been doctored that have made it through. It's just the law of averages. We can debate the point all we want but we'll never REALLY know. |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Tom, |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I hope your grand wizard has been doing this longer than 3 years.....If not he might not be so grand.....You might want to consult someone that has been doing it longer than my newest pair of underwear is old...... |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Wesley
Who is the grand wizard of knowledge of card alterations? |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Kevin Saucier. |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JK
Jim, |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
JK, |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
You know you are batting your head against a brick wall, right? Common sense has never worked with Jim.....The ole adage "common sense isn't so common" never rang more true....Though I do firmly believe that about 99.8% of our members do have good common sense..... |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Jim admitted he was wrong. That's what happens when you post simultaneously. |
#161
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JK
Barry, |
#162
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave F
I dont know what is worse. Trying to understand Crandell or running my knuckles over a cheese grader for 30 minutes. |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Barry, |
#164
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian
They can't all 3 agree, unless its that they all agree you are wrong. |
#165
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
May be wrong...fair enough, the jury is still out. |
#166
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Brian, |
#167
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
I have found this thread to be eerily similar to a horrific car crash. |
#168
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
Jim; |
#169
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Hold tight--I expect to have a statement by Kevin in the next two hours. |
#170
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
A statement about what? |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cobby33
"Ask not what your country can do for you..." |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave F
"Hold tight--I expect to have a statement by Kevin in the next two hours." |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve Murray
"A statement about what?" |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve Murray
Don't you mean Jesus? |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kevin Saucier
I know you're one of Kevin’s biggest supporters I get it and Kevin seems ok, I still don’t really get what he's trying to achieve with his experiments but at least there are thought provoking. |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Bretta
Anyone caught spooning with their cards on the Net54 will be summarily beaten to death by the Grand Wizard. |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave F
Kevin- |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kevin Saucier
(ROTFLMAO) I'm contractually obligated to work through my agent. Soon my people will contact your people. |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I hope Dave doesn't mind me saying but I asked him the question about what cards does he feel might be more prone to altering.....Basically, it's as all people with common sense have said all along....the higher the grade the more prone they are to have issues we are speaking of. Specifically the 8-9 group would be the most prone.....This is stuff we already knew but since he and I were talking I went ahead and asked him. It's just common sense.......regards |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
It will be a bit longer--please stand by. |
#181
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Jim- I'm peeing in my pants...please don't make me wait any longer! |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Eric Brehm
I haven't read this whole thread so forgive me if this has already been said. Obviously there is more economic incentive to alter a high grade card than a low grade one. But high grade cards that are now in holders at least have been inspected by a professional grader and given the stamp of approval. So the percentage of graded cards that have been altered is probably low. The percentage of raw cards that have been altered is probably low also, especially in the lower grades. The ones I would be worried about are the ones that appear to be high grade but haven't been holdered yet -- the question is why aren't they in a holder? It is either because they haven't been sent in yet, or because they have been altered, or appear to be so, and have been rejected as such. |
#183
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave F
As usual Jim. 182 posts now in this thread and all of it meaningless. |
#184
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
I agree with Eric. It's just common sense. Last relatively expensive card I bought raw was a 56 Mantle in NM condition; when that card came back as trimmed from PSA I learned my lesson. |
#185
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
There are very few high grade cards sold today that aren't slabbed. There's no reason to leave all that money on the table when a graded card is worth so much more. |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Dave, |
#187
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Wesley
Leon, That is great.... but you did not talk the the grand wizard. |
#188
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John
Jim; |
#189
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BcD
who know a lot more than anyone who posted in this thread. |
#190
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Here is the message of the master. |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Well as you can see Wonka, Kevin's comments did not relate to what he posted on Full Count. Personally I thought it was against the rules on Net 54 to copy posts from Full Count and post them here so I did not. |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Al C.risafulli
Best. Thread. Ever. |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cobby33
Big news. |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimCrandell
Yup and it will be interesting what the grading companies say. |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Gene Palmer
Is it just me or does anyone else think this thread reminds them of the whack-a-mole game? |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kevin Saucier
I’m the first to admit, consider "everything" I say as hearsay unless I see it with my own eyes. If I theorize I will state it as a thought or opinion. |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BcD
just wondering,did you ask Rob if he has ever altered a card? |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: CoreyRS.hanus
Why is it easier to cover up an alteration to a low grade card than to a high grade card? Other than perhaps soaking, which probably in and of itself is not sufficient to upgrade a card to high grade, why would the typical alteration methods (e.g., trimming, rebuilt corners, added coloring) be more difficult to detect with a vg-ex card than with a nr mt/mt card? I don't understand that. Assuming the grading company is equally diligent looking for such things with low grade cards as they are with high grade cards, why should more things slip through with the low grade cards? |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BcD
your mind is deferred by all the other imperfections so much more obvious |
#200
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: CoreyRS.hanus
I politely disagree. To an experienced grading company that knows what to look for and is as on guard for low grade cards as they are for high grade cards, the telltale signs of trimming, rebuilt corners, added coloring should be equally discernable regardless of the condition of the card. To use the terminology from your example, they should not be thrown off by the big beer gut. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Personal Thanks to Barry Sloate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-09-2007 08:51 PM |
Personal Checks for Sale | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 04-09-2006 10:37 PM |
personal web sites | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 06-23-2005 03:20 PM |
Personal Pictures | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-27-2004 12:26 PM |
Personal Checks | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-16-2004 12:28 PM |