Ted Williams, Joe DiMaggio

Snapolit1 · #1 11-13-2025, 09:56 AM

Has always seemed to me that they are underappreciated in the hobby. They may not be in the upper upper tier of important baseball players in the 20th century, but they are certainly extrordarily important figures. Maybe they are too close to recent memory to have that aura of the 27 Yankees and other great players? Or they lived recently enough that many of us remember them and their personalities, warts and all. Or maybe people disagree. Just feels to me that, as Rodney used to say, they get no respect. Or not enough respect.

gonzo · #2 11-13-2025, 10:22 AM

I think a lot of it is that they missed key sets. DiMaggio�s career fell right between the Goudeys and 1952 Topps. And Williams missed 1952 Topps and a couple of the other 50s Topps sets. So they don�t have what would have been headline cards in �52 Topps. And as cool as some of the �40s and late �30s issues are to us, they don�t have the mass appeal of �52 Topps.

packs · #3 11-13-2025, 10:37 AM

It really is a shame DiMaggio wasn't in the 49, 50 or 51 Bowman sets. Imagine the cards.

Fred · #4 11-13-2025, 10:43 AM

I look at Ted Williams and think, wow, what he could have done if the military service didn't interrupt his career. He'd have had 3K hits, 2K runs and RBIs. Who knows if he'd had a third or fourth triple crown.

Not saying Joe was a slouch. But he was a Yankee and received a lot of props for a career on great Yankee teams and all those WS championships. Now, here's where people are going to say I'm just stupid. I think Joe was a better overall offensive player than (get ready for this), the Mick.

Good points about both missing the 52T set, but I've never looked at players based on what sets they were in. Joe did make the 38 Goudey set, but ok, it's not the prettiest set.

Peter_Spaeth · #5 11-13-2025, 10:51 AM

Both upper tier in my mind.

Mandatory reading.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1...-bid-kid-adieu

DeanH3 · #6 11-13-2025, 11:02 AM

I've wondered if Williams would have stuck around if he had not missed all that time. He could have been close enough to the all-time home run record that maybe he sticks it out a year or two more. He wasn't really struggling when retired.

perezfan · #7 11-13-2025, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Both upper tier in my mind.

Mandatory reading.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1...-bid-kid-adieu

Agree. Both are absolutely top-tier. Ted missed so much time to military service (prime years) that he likely would've reached 700 HRs in addition to the other incredible milestones listed above.

rats60 · #8 11-13-2025, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Both upper tier in my mind.

Mandatory reading.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1...-bid-kid-adieu

I agree. I value my 1941 Play Ball set with Williams and DiMaggio as much as my t206 and 1933 Goudey sets.

I think DiMaggio is hurt more than Williams by missing the 3 seasons due to WWII. Williams gets credit for the time he missed because he played longer than DiMaggio (17 seasons + 2 partial seasons to Joe's 13) and came close to milestones (521 HRs, 2654 hits, 1798 runs, 1839 RBIs). However, what is Joe's legacy if he plays those season and ends up with 11 Championships (most all time) and 4 or 5 MVPs? Joe was considered to better player at the time because he excelled in all phases of the game while Ted was clearly the better hitter. Today it seems like Joe is forgotten by a lot of people.

DiMaggio is also treated poorly by advanced metrics. DiMaggio hit . 325/.398/.579/.977 vs Mantle . 298/.421/.557/.977. You would think that the guy who hit for more power with a higher average would be more valued, but Mantle is credited with an OPS+ of 172 while DiMaggio only 155. So while Mantle took advantage of the short porch in RF at Yankee Stadium, DiMaggio lost hits and HRs in Yankee Stadium's spacious LF. That is ignored by OPS+ and WAR.

Peter_Spaeth · #9 11-13-2025, 03:18 PM

The Richard Ben Cramer biography of DiMaggio did his reputation no favors either.

Then again, no one was singing Ted, Ted Williams, we want you on our side. Or, where have you gone, Ted Williams?

Rhotchkiss · #10 11-13-2025, 03:24 PM

The OP says �under appreciated in the hobby.� I take this to mean value. Assuming that�s the topic, I agree that they are (certainly) a tier below the ultimates. I also agree that�s partly bc of the timing of their careers and their non-inclusion in one or more of the hobby�s ultimate sets.

That said, between the two, I would put my money on Joe D over Ted because (1) he was a Yankee, (2) he has the consecutive hit game record that will never be beat, (3) he is a prominent lyric in a major Simon and Garfunkel song, and (4) he was married to Marilyn Monroe. In other words, there are real and meaningful reasons greater than their baseball career to remember Joe over Ted.

REG1976 · #11 11-13-2025, 03:27 PM

1941 56 Game Hitting Streak

MVSNYC · #12 11-13-2025, 03:57 PM

Great point about neither of them being in some of the more "major" sets- 33 Goudey, 52 Topps, etc.

I'm with Ryan, I'll take Joe D...

9x World Series Champion, 3x MVP...Cool name. Marilyn Monroe.

Leon · #13 11-13-2025, 04:22 PM

One of my fave BST pick ups..

Jobu · #14 11-13-2025, 04:31 PM

I've always thought that Williams doesn't get his due - either in the hobby or overall.

I crunched some numbers on the time he missed for his war service - where he didn't have a cushy gig, he was actually flying planes instead of entertaining troops. For his two tours, I took the season before the tour and after the tour and averaged the stats, including the games played, and then added those stats to his career totals. And note, the missing seasons from the 1950s assume a reasonable number of games played for a guy who was getting a bit older but still had a lot left in the tank. If we assume would have played closer to 150 games those two years, these totals would have been a bit higher.

The career ranks listed below are based on current totals. If we look at the leaders at the time he retired, he would have been #2 in HR and #1 in hits in addition to still being #1 in all of these other stats. In other words, Ted would definitely be held in much higher regard today and for the last 70 years.

oldjudge · #15 11-13-2025, 05:06 PM

Joe D was a better player than Mantle, Mantle just came up during the boomer generation.

Fred · #16 11-13-2025, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jobu

I've always thought that Williams doesn't get his due - either in the hobby or overall.

I crunched some numbers on the time he missed for his war service - where he didn't have a cushy gig. For his two tours, I took the season before the tour and after the tour, and averaged the stats, including the games played, and then added those stats to his career totals. And note, the missing seasons from the 1950s assume a reasonable number of games played for a guy who was getting a bit older but still had a lot left in the tank. If we assume would have played closer to 150 games those two years, these totals would have been a bit higher.

The career ranks listed below are based on current totals. If we look at the leaders at the time he retired, he would have been #2 in HR and #1 in hits in addition to still being #1 in all of these other stats. In other words, Ted would definitely be held in much higher regard today and for the last 70 years.

Jobu!!! You get it! Nice job with the stats Bryan. I'm in the Williams camp over Joe D. Ted probably missed out on MVP votes because he wasn't very friendly with the press.

How do you come in second place in the MVP voting during (2) Triple Crown seasons? Really!

I get it, in 1941 Ted gets 2nd place in the MVP because Joe has that awesome hit streak (vs Ted's .406 batting average). I guess nobody could have predicted that would be the last .400 season, ever.

I hope nobody reads into this and thinks I think Joe was a slouch because he is very underappreciated and was an incredible player.
.
.
.

Snapolit1 · #17 11-13-2025, 06:09 PM

Maybe an a bit of a facile comment, but maybe it's harder to mythologize a guy who you saw on television hawking coffee machines for two decades.

A lot of obscure players in the hobby that none of us ever saw speak or play who seem to retain an aura that's difficut to explain. And who couldn't shine either Williams or DiMaggio's shoes.

robw1959 · #18 11-13-2025, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

The OP says “under appreciated in the hobby.” I take this to mean value. Assuming that’s the topic, I agree that they are (certainly) a tier below the ultimates. I also agree that’s partly bc of the timing of their careers and their non-inclusion in one or more of the hobby’s ultimate sets.

That said, between the two, I would put my money on Joe D over Ted because (1) he was a Yankee, (2) he has the consecutive hit game record that will never be beat, (3) he is a prominent lyric in a major Simon and Garfunkel song, and (4) he was married to Marilyn Monroe. In other words, there are real and meaningful reasons greater than their baseball career to remember Joe over Ted.

Perhaps societally Joe does get a cultural nod, but those cultural points aren't good enough reasons to value him or prefer him as a player over Ted Williams. Nobody ever had the hand and eye coordination of Ted. For example, he was such a great fighter pilot that the military recalled him for both WWII AND the Korean War. Despite protesting the "unfairness" of it, Ted served admirably on the front lines in both, refusing the possibility of just being a USO show military baseball player that was a privilege afforded to some other MLB players during that time. That plus having a greater career OPS than everybody else other than Babe Ruth seals the deal for me.

DeanH3 · #19 11-13-2025, 07:08 PM

If he had been sitting at 691 HR’s he very well could have stuck around and possibly passed Ruth who was only at 715. How would he have been looked at if Aaron had passed Ted Williams record instead of Babe Ruth? Interesting to ponder.

bnorth · #20 11-14-2025, 03:22 PM

I have never really collected many Joe DiMaggio items. I have had a ton of Ted Williams cards. Even with the Fleer complete set he doesn't really have any of those "this is an amazing card" cards. Even if we had a post your favorite Ted card it would just be a bunch of ugly cards.

As for what one is better. I guess I would go with the one that is in the GOAT discussion and not the one that was with a movie actress by a country mile.

GasHouseGang · #21 11-14-2025, 04:27 PM

Another name you could add to this "under appreciated by collectors" list is Stan Musial. His numbers compare favorably with both Williams and DiMaggio. Stan lost one year to military service as well in 1945, but ended up with an impressive career stats line, as well as 3 MVPs, 7 batting titles, 3, World Series, and 24 All-Star appearances.
One thing that also hurt Stan with a lot of impressionable kids was that he wasn't in the early Topps baseball sets. He didn't appear in a Topps set until 1958. He also wasn't in many of the Bowman sets, but did appear in the 1952 and 1953 Bowman offerings.

Gorditadogg · #22 11-14-2025, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GasHouseGang

Another name you could add to this "under appreciated by collectors" list is Stan Musial. His numbers compare favorably with both Williams and DiMaggio. Stan lost one year to military service as well in 1945, but ended up with an impressive career stats line, as well as 3 MVPs, 7 batting titles, 3, World Series, and 24 All-Star appearances.

One thing that also hurt Stan with a lot of impressionable kids was that he wasn't in the early Topps baseball sets. He didn't appear in a Topps set until 1958. He also wasn't in many of the Bowman sets, but did appear in the 1952 and 1953 Bowman offerings.

Stanislaus was the greatest Polish-Amerivan player of all-time. If he had a few more HRs he would be in the discussion of the best ever, alongside Ruth, Williams, Cobb, Mantle, etc.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

robw1959 · #23 11-14-2025, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GasHouseGang

Another name you could add to this "under appreciated by collectors" list is Stan Musial. His numbers compare favorably with both Williams and DiMaggio. Stan lost one year to military service as well in 1945, but ended up with an impressive career stats line, as well as 3 MVPs, 7 batting titles, 3, World Series, and 24 All-Star appearances.
One thing that also hurt Stan with a lot of impressionable kids was that he wasn't in the early Topps baseball sets. He didn't appear in a Topps set until 1958. He also wasn't in many of the Bowman sets, but did appear in the 1952 and 1953 Bowman offerings.

And in one season Stan came within a single home run of capturing the triple crown - 1948?

Tabe · #24 11-14-2025, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robw1959

And in one season Stan came within a single home run of capturing the triple crown - 1948?

Yeah, 1948. He led the league in:

Runs
Hits
Doubles
Triples
RBI
Batting Average
OBP
Slugging
OPS
OPS+
Total Bases

Leon · #25 11-15-2025, 07:21 AM

+1

Quote:

Originally Posted by GasHouseGang

Another name you could add to this "under appreciated by collectors" list is Stan Musial. His numbers compare favorably with both Williams and DiMaggio. Stan lost one year to military service as well in 1945, but ended up with an impressive career stats line, as well as 3 MVPs, 7 batting titles, 3, World Series, and 24 All-Star appearances.
One thing that also hurt Stan with a lot of impressionable kids was that he wasn't in the early Topps baseball sets. He didn't appear in a Topps set until 1958. He also wasn't in many of the Bowman sets, but did appear in the 1952 and 1953 Bowman offerings.

samosa4u · #26 11-15-2025, 11:28 AM

The World Wide Gum DiMaggio is selling just as high as the 52T Mantle. I would say Joe is getting plenty of respect in the hobby.

Vintageclout · #27 11-15-2025, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

The OP says “under appreciated in the hobby.” I take this to mean value. Assuming that’s the topic, I agree that they are (certainly) a tier below the ultimates. I also agree that’s partly bc of the timing of their careers and their non-inclusion in one or more of the hobby’s ultimate sets.

That said, between the two, I would put my money on Joe D over Ted because (1) he was a Yankee, (2) he has the consecutive hit game record that will never be beat, (3) he is a prominent lyric in a major Simon and Garfunkel song, and (4) he was married to Marilyn Monroe. In other words, there are real and meaningful reasons greater than their baseball career to remember Joe over Ted.

Great points Ryan, but you’re missing one piece of significant history. Ted Williams was a true war hero, shooting down 16 enemy aircraft in the Korean War. Add the fact he still arguably stands as baseball’s greatest all-time hitter and you can literally flip a coin between the two.

icollectDCsports · #28 11-15-2025, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GasHouseGang

Another name you could add to this "under appreciated by collectors" list is Stan Musial. His numbers compare favorably with both Williams and DiMaggio. Stan lost one year to military service as well in 1945, but ended up with an impressive career stats line, as well as 3 MVPs, 7 batting titles, 3, World Series, and 24 All-Star appearances.
One thing that also hurt Stan with a lot of impressionable kids was that he wasn't in the early Topps baseball sets. He didn't appear in a Topps set until 1958. He also wasn't in many of the Bowman sets, but did appear in the 1952 and 1953 Bowman offerings.

I agree. I feel the same way about the greatness of Frank Robinson�s career being overshadowed by other more prominent names.

Peter_Spaeth · #29 11-16-2025, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by icollectDCsports

I agree. I feel the same way about the greatness of Frank Robinson�s career being overshadowed by other more prominent names.

Not to trigger anyone, but you could make the case for Frank Robinson as the equal of Clemente, if not better.

Mark17 · #30 11-16-2025, 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vintageclout

Great points Ryan, but you�re missing one piece of significant history. Ted Williams was a true war hero, shooting down 16 enemy aircraft in the Korean War. Add the fact he still arguably stands as baseball�s greatest all-time hitter and you can literally flip a coin between the two.

Ted was also a world-class fisherman. Not saying that means much regarding card value or in any other way, but it highlights the fact that when Ted focused on something, be it hitting a baseball, flying airplanes, or outwitting fish, he made himself one of the best in the world at it.

rats60 · #31 11-16-2025, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by icollectDCsports

I agree. I feel the same way about the greatness of Frank Robinson�s career being overshadowed by other more prominent names.

I think Frank Robinson is overrated. His peak was low for what his reputation is. His WAR7 of 52.9 is less than Charlie Gehringer, Wade Boggs, Eddie Mathews, Ron Santo, Cal Ripken, Arky Vaughan, Carl Yastrzemski, Mookie Betts, Phil Niekro and Robin Roberts. He was overshadowed when he was in the NL because he never led the league in any triple crown category. He also never the NL in WAR. He was 2nd once and 4th 3 times.

bnorth · #32 11-16-2025, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rats60

I think Frank Robinson is overrated. His peak was low for what his reputation is. His WAR7 of 52.9 is less than Charlie Gehringer, Wade Boggs, Eddie Mathews, Ron Santo, Cal Ripken, Arky Vaughan, Carl Yastrzemski, Mookie Betts, Phil Niekro and Robin Roberts. He was overshadowed when he was in the NL because he never led the league in any triple crown category. He also never the NL in WAR. He was 2nd once and 4th 3 times.

This is the first time I have seen Wade, Eddie, and Carl used in this manner. I would bet 99.9% of players have worse stats than those 3.

Kutcher55 · #33 11-16-2025, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bnorth

I have never really collected many Joe DiMaggio items. I have had a ton of Ted Williams cards. Even with the Fleer complete set he doesn't really have any of those "this is an amazing card" cards. Even if we had a post your favorite Ted card it would just be a bunch of ugly cards.

As for what one is better. I guess I would go with the one that is in the GOAT discussion and not the one that was with a movie actress by a country mile.

I think the 41 play ball Ted and the 49 Leaf are both beautiful. Both have increased quite a bit in value in the past year. My favorite Joe D is the 39 Play Ball.

Peter_Spaeth · #34 11-16-2025, 01:10 PM

I like both the WF Ted and the 54T #1. Also the Red Man. I think he has lots of outstanding cards.

robw1959 · #35 11-16-2025, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Not to trigger anyone, but you could make the case for Frank Robinson as the equal of Clemente, if not better.

Absolutely. Has anyone else ever been a Rookie of the Year, an MVP in both leagues, a World Series MVP, a Triple Crown winner, and a gold glove winner?

raulus · #36 11-16-2025, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robw1959

Absolutely. Has anyone else ever been a Rookie of the Year, an MVP in both leagues, a World Series MVP, a Triple Crown winner, and a gold glove winner?

Give it time. Ohtani the Great will get there soon enough. And if not, it was only because he was robbed.

Peter_Spaeth · #37 11-16-2025, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus

Give it time. Ohtani the Great will get there soon enough. And if not, it was only because he was robbed.

He will leap tall buildings in a single bound before he wins a gold glove.

pherbener · #38 11-16-2025, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jobu

I've always thought that Williams doesn't get his due - either in the hobby or overall.

I crunched some numbers on the time he missed for his war service - where he didn't have a cushy gig, he was actually flying planes instead of entertaining troops. For his two tours, I took the season before the tour and after the tour and averaged the stats, including the games played, and then added those stats to his career totals. And note, the missing seasons from the 1950s assume a reasonable number of games played for a guy who was getting a bit older but still had a lot left in the tank. If we assume would have played closer to 150 games those two years, these totals would have been a bit higher.

The career ranks listed below are based on current totals. If we look at the leaders at the time he retired, he would have been #2 in HR and #1 in hits in addition to still being #1 in all of these other stats. In other words, Ted would definitely be held in much higher regard today and for the last 70 years.

Thanks Bryan! This is the first thing I thought of when considering this post. Great work putting the numbers together! Also, as Steve mentioned, as a guy in his late fifties, my only real memory of Joe D is some old baseball player selling coffee machines. Not that DiMaggio wasn�t one of the greats. BTW figured I�d share one of my favorite photos of those two here from 1941.

DeanH3 · #39 11-17-2025, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus

Give it time. Ohtani the Great will get there soon enough. And if not, it was only because he was robbed.

Shame on you for not acknowledging that Ohtani is already the GOAT. You will give the Fanboi's on Blow Out a stroke. They have moved on from Kris Bryant and Mike Trout, I guess.

Thay crack me up over there. I think the vast majority of Net54 thinks Ohtani is a generational talent and has the "potential" to be a GOAT. But if you don't bend the knee and already worship him as the GOAT, then you're just a Boomer that can't let go of the past. LOL!!

GasHouseGang · #40 11-17-2025, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vintageclout

Great points Ryan, but you’re missing one piece of significant history. Ted Williams was a true war hero, shooting down 16 enemy aircraft in the Korean War. Add the fact he still arguably stands as baseball’s greatest all-time hitter and you can literally flip a coin between the two.

Not to diminish anything Ted Williams did during his military career, but all the on-line sources I looked up said, "Ted Williams shot down four enemy aircraft during the Korean War. He was officially credited with three kills during his service, but a fourth was only confirmed later when Russian records were declassified."

raulus · #41 11-17-2025, 11:16 AM

Underappreciated? Or are other players just overappreciated?

I suppose that we can argue whether it's two sides to the same coin.

But part of me would almost argue that you're looking at a few other players whose cards are in the stratosphere, and therefore Joe and Ted are underappreciated because they're only in the troposphere, whereas I would suggest that the opposite is true - those other players in the stratosphere are just way too overappreciated, at least relative to their results on the field.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
39 PB DiMaggio and 41 PB Williams - SOLD	wondo	1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	04-25-2022 07:50 AM
DiMaggio and Berra for Williams?	GasHouseGang	Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)	6	04-20-2022 07:31 PM
help on these, DiMaggio & Williams BB	jcmtiger	Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports	5	05-26-2020 06:28 PM
Who was better, who would you take, Joe DiMaggio or Ted Williams?	CMIZ5290	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	69	04-27-2013 08:01 AM
WTB: Williams, Dimaggio, etc..	GiantsDude24	1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T	0	01-28-2013 03:55 PM