NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2024, 03:20 PM
ajjohnsonsoxfan ajjohnsonsoxfan is offline
A.J. Johnson
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,491
Default Which Jackie would you buy?

Thinking about adding a 52 Jackie. Torn between these two. One PSA and the other SGC. Which do you like better?

REA SGC 8 (ends 9/22/24):
https://bid.robertedwardauctions.com...?itemid=188465 (https://bid.robertedwardauctions.com...?itemid=188465)

HERITAGE PSA 8 (ends 10/4/24)
https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball-c...ription-071515 (https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball-c...ription-071515)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0167.jpg (124.9 KB, 902 views)
File Type: jpeg IMG_0168.JPEG (74.3 KB, 896 views)
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace
https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39
*Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-13-2024, 03:24 PM
BillyCoxDodgers3B BillyCoxDodgers3B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,368
Default

If you want an 8, I'd surely wait. Both of those cards are irksome, both for the grade and how they present regardless.

What's going on with the bottom corner of the SGC? Unidentifiable detritus? Common printer's mark of which I wasn't aware?

More things going on with them?

For all the aspects which would trouble me with those two cards, I have to imagine there are countless examples even three grades lower which I would find much more aesthetically pleasing, but that's just me.

Last edited by BillyCoxDodgers3B; 09-13-2024 at 03:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2024, 03:28 PM
Lorewalker's Avatar
Lorewalker Lorewalker is offline
Chase
Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 1,736
Default

I would pass on both regardless of the price.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-13-2024, 03:35 PM
ajjohnsonsoxfan ajjohnsonsoxfan is offline
A.J. Johnson
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,491
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyCoxDodgers3B View Post
If you want an 8, I'd surely wait. Both of those cards are irksome, both for the grade and how they present regardless.

What's going on with the bottom corner of the SGC? Unidentifiable detritus? Common printer's mark of which I wasn't aware?

More things going on with them?

For all the aspects which would trouble me with those two cards, I have to imagine there are countless examples even three grades lower which I would find much more aesthetically pleasing, but that's just me.
Just noticed the mark on the SGC. Maybe common printers mark? Noticed it on this PSA 8.5 as well.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 16774398.jpeg (141.0 KB, 880 views)
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace
https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39
*Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-13-2024, 03:37 PM
BillyCoxDodgers3B BillyCoxDodgers3B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,368
Default

Yep. Thought that was likely the case.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-13-2024, 03:42 PM
ccre's Avatar
ccre ccre is offline
Dave Wilson
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 787
Default

Choosing between the two options? The SGC all day long.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-13-2024, 03:42 PM
Snowman's Avatar
Snowman Snowman is offline
Travis
Tra,vis Tr,ail
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 2,429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyCoxDodgers3B View Post
What's going on with the bottom corner of the SGC? Unidentifiable detritus? Common printer's mark of which I wasn't aware?
That is a very common print mark. It is present on Type 1 Jackies which are cut high enough. The SGC 8 is a Type 1, the PSA 8 is a Type 2.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyCoxDodgers3B View Post
For all the aspects which would trouble me with those two cards, I have to imagine there are countless examples even three grades lower which I would find much more aesthetically pleasing, but that's just me.
Ya, I agree. I would pass on both of these copies. That said, the SGC 8 is the far superior card of the two above. I would wait for a centered copy to surface in a lower grade, personally. Although then you'd probably find yourself competing against me if you found one lol.
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-13-2024, 03:50 PM
Snowman's Avatar
Snowman Snowman is offline
Travis
Tra,vis Tr,ail
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 2,429
Default

Here are a few of mine. I would much rather buy 3 of these than one of those.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1952T Trio.jpg (198.4 KB, 864 views)
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it.

Last edited by Snowman; 09-13-2024 at 03:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-13-2024, 04:13 PM
BillyCoxDodgers3B BillyCoxDodgers3B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
That is a very common print mark. It is present on Type 1 Jackies which are cut high enough. The SGC 8 is a Type 1, the PSA 8 is a Type 2.
Thanks. Yeah, it's coming back to me the more I stare at it. My hobby focus has been off (unsigned) cards for over 30 years, so a lot of that old knowledge I used to carry around was clearly pushed aside to make room for information more relevant to my side of things!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-13-2024, 04:23 PM
ajjohnsonsoxfan ajjohnsonsoxfan is offline
A.J. Johnson
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,491
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
That is a very common print mark. It is present on Type 1 Jackies which are cut high enough. The SGC 8 is a Type 1, the PSA 8 is a Type 2.



Ya, I agree. I would pass on both of these copies. That said, the SGC 8 is the far superior card of the two above. I would wait for a centered copy to surface in a lower grade, personally. Although then you'd probably find yourself competing against me if you found one lol.
What's difference between type 1 and type 2? Wasn't aware of the different designations....
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace
https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39
*Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-13-2024, 04:32 PM
LEHR's Avatar
LEHR LEHR is offline
Paul Lehr
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Utah/Indiana
Posts: 744
Default

Between the two 8's listed I'd take the SGC. The centering kills it for me on the PSA card even though the registration is a little better on the PSA. Ultimately for the kind of money these will bring I'd probably wait for a better copy to come up.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-13-2024, 05:15 PM
Kidnapped18's Avatar
Kidnapped18 Kidnapped18 is offline
Ton.y Be.ll
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Alabama
Posts: 491
Default

SGC is clearly the better copy
PSA example has that printers mark/defect on top of hat and is not centered with slight skew to the right
__________________
Tony

Collecting:
1909-1911 T206 Southern Leaguers
1914 Cracker Jack Set (94 out of 145)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-16-2024, 06:27 AM
Republicaninmass Republicaninmass is offline
T3d $h3rm@n
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,575
Default

Im not OK with the dramatic tilt on the top of the sgc card and not as much at the bottom.

That would irk me until I sold it

That psa 8 looks like an old flip that was cleansed into a new flip.

Hard pass on both here, more so at the precipice of the market IMO
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" ©

Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-13-2024, 05:10 PM
Snowman's Avatar
Snowman Snowman is offline
Travis
Tra,vis Tr,ail
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 2,429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajjohnsonsoxfan View Post
What's difference between type 1 and type 2? Wasn't aware of the different designations....
There are numerous differences when you examine them closely, but here are a few that make it easy to detect right away, circled in yellow in the images below.
  • The top left corner of the image box on a Type 1 is sharper and protrudes out to the left, whereas on the Type 2, it has more of a smooth rounded corner
  • The stars on the left edge of the name box has a partial white star at the top of the box in the Type 1s that isn't present on the Type 2s
  • The top border black line is more slanted on the Type 1 than on the Type 2
  • There is often a small print mark on Type 1s at the bottom right corner in the border, as shown in the SGC 8 in the OP
  • There is sometimes a small fisheye near Jackie's hat in the Type 2s that isn't present in the Type 1s (but isn't always present in Type 2s)
  • On the back, the threads on the baseball face right in the Type 2s (top image shown below) and they face left in the Type 1s
  • The right edge of the text box alignment extends further to the right on Type 1s than it does on Type 2s
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1933 Goudey 110 copy.jpg (179.3 KB, 840 views)
File Type: jpg 1933 Goudey 109 copy.jpg (209.4 KB, 846 views)
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it.

Last edited by Snowman; 09-13-2024 at 05:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-14-2024, 12:20 AM
ajjohnsonsoxfan ajjohnsonsoxfan is offline
A.J. Johnson
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,491
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
There are numerous differences when you examine them closely, but here are a few that make it easy to detect right away, circled in yellow in the images below.
  • The top left corner of the image box on a Type 1 is sharper and protrudes out to the left, whereas on the Type 2, it has more of a smooth rounded corner
  • The stars on the left edge of the name box has a partial white star at the top of the box in the Type 1s that isn't present on the Type 2s
  • The top border black line is more slanted on the Type 1 than on the Type 2
  • There is often a small print mark on Type 1s at the bottom right corner in the border, as shown in the SGC 8 in the OP
  • There is sometimes a small fisheye near Jackie's hat in the Type 2s that isn't present in the Type 1s (but isn't always present in Type 2s)
  • On the back, the threads on the baseball face right in the Type 2s (top image shown below) and they face left in the Type 1s
  • The right edge of the text box alignment extends further to the right on Type 1s than it does on Type 2s
Thanks for all the info and laid out so nicely! Very informative. What version is the more desirable?
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace
https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39
*Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-13-2024, 05:32 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 33,554
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajjohnsonsoxfan View Post
What's difference between type 1 and type 2? Wasn't aware of the different designations....
Yes it's like the Mantle, which was double printed with slight differences between the versions.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions.

My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-13-2024, 03:34 PM
GeoPoto's Avatar
GeoPoto GeoPoto is offline
Ge0rge Tr0end1e
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Saint Helena Island, SC
Posts: 1,706
Default

I prefer the one I already have.

Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-13-2024, 03:35 PM
BillyCoxDodgers3B BillyCoxDodgers3B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoPoto View Post
I prefer the one I already have.
...and there you go. That didn't take long! And it's a 5.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-15-2024, 08:54 PM
ejharrington ejharrington is offline
Er.ic H@rrington
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajjohnsonsoxfan View Post
Thinking about adding a 52 Jackie. Torn between these two. One PSA and the other SGC. Which do you like better?

REA SGC 8 (ends 9/22/24):
https://bid.robertedwardauctions.com...?itemid=188465 (https://bid.robertedwardauctions.com...?itemid=188465)

HERITAGE PSA 8 (ends 10/4/24)
https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball-c...ription-071515 (https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball-c...ription-071515)
The SGC and it’s not even close.
__________________
Contact me if you have any Dave Kingman cards / memorabilia for sale.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-15-2024, 09:23 PM
Gorditadogg Gorditadogg is offline
Al Stein
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,298
Default

The SGC looks nice to me.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-15-2024, 10:16 PM
robw1959 robw1959 is offline
Rob
Rob.ert We.ekes
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,552
Default

The SGC 8 is better.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-15-2024, 10:44 PM
icurnmedic icurnmedic is offline
Thomas
Th0mas Ch.urch
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Lenoir, NC
Posts: 584
Default

Both are weak for the grade.
With these, My inclination is to the SGC but the image is better on the PSA! I’m guessing the SGC may be significantly less $ so that would be the one I would make a play for.
__________________
Successful transactions: sycks22, charlietheextervminator, Scocs, Thromdog, trdcrdkid, mybuddyinc, troutbum97, Natedog, Kingcobb, usernamealreadytaken, t206fanatic, asoriano, rsdill2, hatchetman325, cobbcobb13, dbfirstman, Blunder19, Scott L. ,Eggoman, ncinin, vintagewhitesox, aloondilana, btcarfagno, ZiggerZagger, blametony, shammus, Kris19, brewing, rootsearcher60, Pat R , sportscardpete , Leon , OriolesHOF , Gobucsmagic74, Pilot172000, Chesbro41, scmavl,t206kid,3-2-count,GoldenAge50s
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-16-2024, 06:14 AM
Johnny630 Johnny630 is offline
Johnny MaZilli
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,310
Default

SGC 8 out of these two. No question.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB/WTT for 1952 topps Jackie Robinson, 1951 and 52 bowman Mantle and Jackie- also in Yellowstonesportscards 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 02-21-2023 12:20 PM
Perfectly centered and registered '48 Leaf Jackie Robinson, Dimaggio, '49 Jackie Sean1125 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 1 05-24-2021 09:35 PM
1952 BerkRoss Musial PSA 7, 53 Jackie PSA 4, 55 Golden Stamps Koufax Jackie PSA 9 Zact 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 02-25-2018 12:13 PM
Happy Bday Jackie! Show your favorite Jackie items JoeyFarino Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 18 02-06-2016 09:20 AM
1953 Topps Lot (78 cards): 2 Jackie Robinson's / Campy $390 *Another Jackie added* sycks22 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 14 11-01-2011 08:47 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:54 AM.


ebay GSB