![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Had anyone encountered this before…
I recently purchased an SGC1 1953 Topps Jackie Robinson on eBay. The card was sent through eBay’s authentication services and came back to me as authentic. This card is for my binder set so when I received it I cracked it open as I’ve done hundreds of times before. The card looks, feels, and smells legit to me. However, the label has been sitting here on my desk for about 2 weeks now and I just happened to pick it up and noticed that the ink was smudging. I ran my thumb across it with very little pressure and it erased the entire label. The ink just wiped right off like it was a dry erase board. I’ve never encountered this before with any SGC or PSA labels. Has anyone else? Is this a fake card or at best a fake slip? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I will go out on a limb and say the ink just wasn't settled on the kind of paper the flip is on. The card looks fine and it's a 1. It's not like someone tried to put a higher grade in the holder. That is my best guess
![]() .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 10-11-2022 at 11:01 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Authentic card.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Card looks good to me.
A dry erase type of label would be a scammer's dream come true. Brian |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, agree on both counts. Not thrilled though that the label can be so easily and cleanly erased. Someone will, if they haven't already, figure out how to use the old labels to print new ones creating a counterfeit item. Anyway to let SGC know?
__________________
Thanks for your thoughts, Joe. Love the late 1800’s Boston Beaneaters and the early Boston Red Sox (1903-1918)! Also collecting any and all basketball memorabilia. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does the SGC Cert match a Jackie Robinson and have you looked to see if the cert # has ever sold where maybe you can see an old pic? Obviously, no issue with an "overgrade" unless the intent was to cover up an alteration (but who would alter a card that is a "1" after alteration?). The bigger concern would be an aged reprint that is put in a fake SGC holder to avoid scrutiny.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You're good, it matches the card that SGC has a scan of for that cert#.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe your thumb is highly acidic.
![]()
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, all. I really appreciate everyone’s input. I thought it highly unlikely that a 1 would have been tampered with but I couldn’t believe I easily I was able to run off the ink. I guess I won’t be keeping that flip in the binder.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1952 Star-Cal Decals Jackie Robinson and Jackie Robinson / Roy Campanella | CharleyBrown | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-12-2020 07:38 PM |
WTB: 1955 Exhibits Post Card Back Jackie Robinson and 1950 R423 Jackie Robinson | CharleyBrown | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 03-22-2016 11:15 PM |
Jackie Robinson Signed GPC "Best Wishes Jackie Robinson" w/Full PSA/DNA - SOLD | canjond | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 8 | 09-23-2012 11:44 PM |
WTB: 1950 R423 Jackie Robinson / Strip with Jackie Robinson | CharleyBrown | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-15-2011 03:53 PM |
1920 W519 Wilbur Robinson...Counterfeit/reprint or variation? | novakjr | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-07-2011 12:59 AM |