![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’ve been wondering what this mark is just above Babe’s knees… looks like a penciled arrow? But the grade does not an “Mk” designation -
Could this be a print mark? No biggie but just curious what this might be. Love this card but have been meaning to ask since I picked this up last year. Thanks for your help Jeff |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
need a bigger image.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
https://memorylaneinc.com/site/bids/...e?itemid=49472
Here's the original listing which allows us to zoom in, It appears that it's a pencil mark? That's what it looks like to me.
__________________
Successful Deals With: charlietheexterminator, todeen, tonyo, Santo10fan Bocabirdman (5x), 8thEastVB, JCMTiger, Rjackson44 Republicaninmass, 73toppsmann, quinnsryche (2x), Donscards. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
pen or pencil
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It could be pencil or pen, or it could be literally any other type of scuff or dirt mark from knocking around all these years. Regardless, it's still a great looking card.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It’s curious to me why the grade would not have MK listed… could the original grader have requested no modifiers and maybe that bumped it down from a higher grade + Mk to its final grade of 2 with no qualifier?
Either way, it’s the center piece of my HOF collection! Thx for the input (although that original price sold at auction hurts me a little! Wish I bought it then!) |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PSA sometimes misses marks, and therefore doesn't annotate them because they failed to look at the whole card. Just another example of incompetence. They have called MK and MC automatic qualifiers, which can not be removed even upon request.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And very lazy (IMHO) of Memory Lane not to even describe the attributes of the card. If this piece was in LOTG or REA, they'd provide a detailed description of what you're bidding on. I am not a fan of sellers (eBay or AH) who simply state the grade with no other description of condition. It's just laziness. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB 1933 Goudey Ruth #144 and/or 1934 Goudey Gehrig #37 | Zan | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-26-2020 05:07 PM |
FS: 33 Goudey Ruth and 34 Goudey Gehrig in poor condition | sylbry | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 06-22-2014 11:56 AM |
WTT-1934 Goudey Gehrig BVG 1.5+ cash for your Ruth Goudey 144 or Sports King | frankh8147 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 02-08-2013 11:35 AM |
Mark Haverkos Final Answer to 1930 Ruth Card Controversy | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 03-31-2007 10:26 AM |
Goudey PSA card - mark? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-06-2005 10:22 AM |