![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the near future, all cards submitted to TPGs if found altered or restored in any way will have an "A" stamped on the back of the card. Code letters or numbers could also be added noting the alteration. The card would then be holdered with a cert.#.
Submitters would not have the option of having "bad" cards simply returned so they could be resubmitted until they passed. Now altered cards are going from one HA to another until sold. With the "stamp" buyers at least would know what they are getting and adjust bids according. I believe something of this sort would help in eliminating fraud that exists in the hobby. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.
![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
haha...obamacare for cards.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe even institute one of those death panels, where altered cards are put out of their misery.
Last edited by Snapolit1; 06-27-2019 at 10:26 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stamps have been marked on the back by experts for a very long time. It's more of a thing in Europe than the US, where we've had certificates for nearly as long.
German and Spanish expertisers will mark forgeries - usually with the word "false" in whatever language they use. But most of Europe is moving away from marking the stamps on the back, and towards certificates. Modern ones have a photo of the item on the certificate, which isn't perfect. The question that arises is what to do with an item that is determined to be fake or altered, but later can be proven to be good? It's a tricky thing no matter how you look at it. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great idea. Now I can tell everyone that I have a faux Wagner.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Of course this stamped letter should be scarlet in color to indicate 'Adulterated'
Brian Last edited by brianp-beme; 06-27-2019 at 10:43 AM. Reason: added title, as all books have titles |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like the idea, but I agree, maybe on short/EOT, (unless clear proof of trimming} they simply mark short or Not size (N9) or whatever they call it and for all practical purposes it would remove those cards from circulation.
__________________
MY EBAY STORE; If you see something you Like PM me. If you bought off me and were happy let others know; if you bought off me and weren't satisfied for whatever reason let me know.. Last edited by cardsnstuff; 06-27-2019 at 07:19 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The solution is to make the penalty for deceptively altering a card so hideous and gruesome that the potential perpetrator gets PTSD just thinking about it.
Other potentially useful techniques were used Clockwork Orange |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A card found to be altered should be further altered with an inked-on handlebar mustache. And aviator shades.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Oh, and if somebody were to stamp my card, I would drop-kick him. The End |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
There has to be a better solution | SMPEP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 04-20-2013 07:53 PM |
A possible solution for the PSA 8 T206 Wagner? | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 149 | 10-24-2012 12:34 PM |
The solution to all of these threads- altering? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-01-2006 06:06 AM |
solution to ethical problems? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-17-2005 12:38 PM |
Pop-Up Ads---A solution | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-28-2002 10:11 AM |