![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'll just admit I can't see it. When I click the link it says I need to subscribe or sign in. So what'd it say?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It focuses only on his base Topps cards and shows their appreciation from 2006 to 2016 in top condition . For example for the 52 card it shows a 674 % appreciation on the high end, but has comparisons for each base card. No Bowman comparisons, nor test issues, regionals, inserts, ect. Overall for all his Topps base cards, 52 to 69, it posits an appreciation of 544 %. The analysis is through 9-10-16
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Beats what the bank pays!
Do we need to start a mutual fund that buys baseball cards?
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Who is our best candidate here to manage such a fund ?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matty C
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A relevant question is, is something an investment if you're knowingly buying it at the top of the market?
Granted, "top" doesn't necessarily mean "peak" but I certainly don't go out of my way to buy my stocks when they're at the highest price they've been at in recent history. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Successful transactions with: jp216 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No one would want to buy at the "top" of the market, but I wonder how many investors buy a stock because they read an article in the WSJ about how well it was doing and hoped the trend would continue, even though the ship had likely sailed.
I read the article as more of a "you should have kept you cards because..." rahter than you should buy now. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
if you got these 15 years ago you did very well ..
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry S ( sflyank) has raised this question before. Given the increase in his Topps base cards reflected in the article and in particular his 52 card which is certainly not hard to find, why has there not seemed to be a similar jump in his rare or scarce Topps items that would be on the list of any master Mantle collector...such as Topps 61 Dice, 63 Mask, 66 or 67 Punch Outs, 67 of 68 Discs , or 67 Stand Up. All of these would fetch a high price but probably no where near a top notch 52 card
I get that odd ball items are not as well known in general and so demand is less, but Mantle collectors surely know about them and getting some of those items is next to impossible. Just a matter of curiosity to me. These things do not come up often and given the current Mantle market if they did maybe the prices would be significantly higher than in the past |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The others don't trade hands enough, in my opinion, for us to really get a fair look at the price. How could they when you and Larry own basically everything that exists? That said, I don't think they get as much respect given their lack of appeal to the less informed collectors. The Master Set guys "need everything" and have resigned themselves to never being able to pick those up either because you have them all or because of the price, and they don't have the same appeal to the non-collectors with the massive bankrolls that just want that one trophy item. If I should a Dice Game card to a non-collector, he would say, "that's kind of boring looking." Every non-collector that was a kid in the 80s is excited when they see a 1952 Topps though.
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm a long time friend of Bobby Richardson, we have a breakfast group that meets every Friday called the ROMEO club, retired old men eating out.
I often kidded Bobby that I could afford his cards but not Mickey Mantle's. Bobby's a wonderful person, very humble, friendly, and always goes out of his way to make a stranger feel like a long time friend. Great stories about the Yankee days. He and Kubek were the milkshake twins. He always signs his autograph in a beautiful, very legible way. He explained he met Stan Musial as a kid and got his autograph. He was so impressed with Musial's autograph quality that when people began asking for his autograph he promised himself that if people were nice enough to ask for his signature he'd write it as nicely as possible. Look at any Richardson autograph and you'll see what I mean. A quality man. I do have 2 1952 Topps Mantles. I've had for many, many years. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Good luck, guys, Larry |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of my fondest collecting fantasies involves a demo crew in a NY suburb opening up an old warehouse padlocked for sixty years and finding hundreds of cases of pristine 1952 Topps high-numbered cards that had somehow escaped the stachybotris and mildew threats. I wonder what that might do to the investment potential of Mr. Mantle's card?
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Rare Mantle Test Issues especially the dice game would sell for a fortune in a Heritage, REA, Goodwin Auction. Maybe not 1952 Topps 9-10 money but it would be a pretty penny.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Best wishes, Larry |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cards = Investments | EvilKing00 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 68 | 02-09-2013 05:42 PM |
Vintage cards as investments | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 06-26-2008 11:09 AM |
Your focus? Sets, Type Cards, or just plain Investments? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 04-05-2007 08:54 PM |
Cracker Jacks at auction vintage*investments | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 01-09-2007 09:06 PM |
Are Pre-War Baseball Cards "Solid" Investments? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 08-25-2006 04:51 PM |