Ruth check

[yanks12025]

What do you guys think of this Ruth check? I suspect it might not be good if it's not a reprint(doesn't look like one). thanks

[tazdmb]

I think it is real and quite valuable.

[w7imel]

Originally Posted by tazdmb

I think it is real and quite valuable.

+ 1 Looks valuable for sure!!! Is this item for sale? Check is in Claire's hand but full Ruth signature really rare and valuable.

[Mac927]

I was just going to post this same question as it was just listed on eBay for $22,000.

I have some concerns about both the Babe and Claire signatures. Claire looks very slow and not much flow. I've compared her handwriting to other checks and this one seems a bit different.

The Babe's signature looks good at first glance but 2nd G in George looks a little shaky. I'm no expert but when I compared it to other checks from 1946 and 1947 I do have my doubt's.

I would be interested in hearing from some of the experts on this forum



B.

[yanks12025]

That seller doesn't own this check! Nor do I, but am just asking thoughts on it.

[Klrdds]

Good check or not it is not worth $22,000.

[David Atkatz]

The check is fine.
But not worth the ask.

[filmmaker]

Either way, the check is no good. Signature is "Off" and Claire's signature is a clear indicator. The forger did a good version of Ruth, but chopped up Claire's signature with slow pen-flow and stop/start marks. Clearly the forger practiced the Babe's signature but didn't practice Claire's. I saw multiple auctions of Babe Ruth blank checks which sold. I have no doubt in my mind. The check is not worth $22,000. It is not worth $1 either.

[David Atkatz]

The check is good. Of that, I have no doubt. Ever try faking those punch cancellations? Try it sometime. Claire's signature and handwriting are fine, as is the Babe's.