THANKS - Got the advice I needed

[jason.1969]

As some of you know, I am in the market for a low-ish grade (G, G-VG, VG, VG+) Hornsby from the Diamond Stars set.

Right now there are four different ones for sale on eBay that all have semi-comparable prices ($115-135)--all higher than I was hoping to pay, admittedly--and perhaps semi-comparable conditions.

I'm just curious if any of you might point to 1-2 of them as being clearly a cut above (or below) the others. (And naturally, if you have one even better for less, you're welcome to message me about it as well.)

HORNSBY 1 (below) - Back of card not available at the moment. And note "Indianapolis" in cursive on front bottom border.

Hornsby_115.JPG

HORNSBY 2 (below)

Hornsby_118.JPG

HORNSBY 3 (below)

Hornsby_125.jpg Hornsby_125B.jpg

HORNSBY 4 (below) - Note some paper loss on bottom right corner of back.

Hornsby_135.jpg Hornsby_135B.jpg

[Luke]

I like 2,3,4. But 4 is clearly the nicest imo. However, I think you should consider being patient and waiting for one that you really like. Maybe also wait for an auction rather than picking between those four.

[BicycleSpokes]

Not an expert or anything, but especially in lower grade I would tend to go with eye appeal above all else. I like the strong colors of contestant no. 2!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[brianp-beme]

I would also go for color...based on the scans, either #2 or 4. A poor scan certainly can make a card look worse. I think #3 might be suffering from poor scan syndrome.

Brian

[glchen]

I would wait for an auction, but if you can't wait, I like #4 the best.

[swarmee]

I prefer #4, with #2 a close second if you want a grade higher than 1 for paper loss. #3 has bad registration; makes it look like one of those 3D movies where half the picture is in red, and half in blue, but when you put the glasses on, it goes away. Too bad there are no "Hornsby glasses" to put on for that one... ;-)

[edjs]

4, no doubt.