![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well-centered, colorful card. No paper loss that I can see. Why the low grade?
![]() ![]() Thanks, Joe |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I can see several creases but it almost looks like there is a bit of missing paper under the A in Chicago.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like several creases and some staining on an off center back. There looks like there could be some kind of ink mark near the "T" the second "S" word "Subjects" too. Still a great 1!
Last edited by packs; 11-12-2013 at 01:13 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
looks like maybe erasure below evers, chicago?
Last edited by ullmandds; 11-12-2013 at 01:18 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My guess too... and assume that the submitter wanted the grade without qualifier.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a crop of the area in question. Not perfect but not paper loss or erasure that I can tell...
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What about on the back near the word "Subjects?" Looks like some kind of stray ink near the letters T and S.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If that's a PSA 1 I'll eat my shorts.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree, but I ain't eating Stache's shorts (or my own).
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice card Joe. Is there any surface abrasion along the back right edge? It's a fantastic card regardless of the grade it gets from SGC.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It says 1 so please video while eating. jk
I agree with most on here. A 2-2.5 is where I would put it. Must have been a bad day for the grader and taking it out on your card. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I count maybe a dozen wrinkles and creases. I agree, a one is a bit tough, but I can't see it in anything higher than a two. Still nice!
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think it's kinda funny/strange there seems to be more interest in a mildly misgraded common T206...than a fake Magie error!!!
Funny! |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() But on a serious note. Evers is more attainable for most folks. Magie vs. Magee is of no consequence to the average board member except as a cautionary tale of fraud. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wtb: T206 carl lundgren (chi.) and Evers (cubs shirt) in nice grade | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 07-20-2012 11:44 AM |
WTB: T206 Evers (Cubs on shirt), Lajoie (Batting), low SGC grade | eiturbe | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 04-12-2011 10:10 AM |
WTB: T206 Tinker and Evers portraits (raw or low grade) | Woundedduck | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 09-14-2010 07:17 PM |
WTB low grade Evers T206 portrait | bengineno9 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 08-14-2009 08:23 AM |
Looking for t206 low grade Tinker, Evers, Chance, Cobb | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 01-23-2007 08:30 PM |