![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just wondering why this card is not considered to be a variation like the "Noodgrass"..
All thoughts are welcome... and if you have an example please post a pic.. ![]() ![]() Happy 4th of July Everyone. Jamie |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi, Jamie,
Based on your photo of the Lundgren it appears that the down-stroke and corresponding upstroke on the -N has worn away. As such, I don't see how it would qualify as a variant. I have seen cards in my collecting experience where there is evidence of similar wear to a player's name. Happy Fourth to you and everyone else! Cheers, Mike |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hello Jamie,
Here is my example of the partial "N" (Piedmont 150), plus a Lundgren without the partial "N" (tougher Piedmont 350). Whether it is a variation or not is for others to debate, but since I have one..........I'm calling it a variation along the same lines of the partial "S" in Nodgrass. The "N" stroke has not worn away, it simply is not there. Jamie actually pointed-out the partial "N" Lundgren in a prior thread a few years back and ever since then I've been looking for another. I've found one more (in an eBay auction about a year ago) but past on pulling the snipe trigger. pic 016.jpgpic 017.jpg pic 019.jpgpic 020.jpg Lovely Day... Last edited by iggyman; 07-04-2011 at 09:41 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
T206 gallery |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Cool chris.. thanks for pointing that one for sale out..
So since others do exist (thanks Iggy).. I WOULD consider it a varation... wouldnt others agree? Still looking for a reasonable explination on whi it would not be a variation.... Thanks Jamie |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Are there any P150s that do not have the partial 'N'?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've mentioned another possible variation before, but never really pushed it, because I thought it was just exclusive to certain backs...BUT there's two on ebay right now, that show the variation existing even among the same back.
http://cgi.ebay.com/1909-11-T206-PIE...item53e828934f http://cgi.ebay.com/1909-1911-T206-O...item2c5d49b048 Both of these Wilson's have the Piedmont 350 back. While showing both variations in the red/orange burst in the background.. By that same thought, is this partial N exclusive to the Piedmont 150's, and is there complete N versions within the Piedmont 150's? Last edited by novakjr; 07-05-2011 at 10:24 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another New T205 Variation | marcdelpercio | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 08-30-2010 01:35 PM |
T206 Lundgren | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 02-21-2009 09:36 AM |
Errors & Variation Discoveries Thread | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 03-24-2008 09:04 PM |
T206 Carl Lundgren, Chicago variation | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 05-06-2007 10:44 AM |
The Magie - Doyle Error vs Variation Caper | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-15-2003 02:44 AM |