|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Roll-off effect of valuable cards
Does a highly rare and expensive card of a player affect the value of their other cards?
Do Plank and Wagner cards get a boost because of the T206? What about Bengough in sets other than '33 Goudey? Lindstrom aside from US Caramel? Pafko? etc. Side question: Who's cards have the highest value compared to their rarity? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
'52 Topps Campos might be on the list
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I always thought the t206 Magee went for higher then other commons because of its error twin. The Doyle goes for a premium.. because of its error twin.
So I'd say yes... |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I say no. I don't think Plank's cards in other sets, for example, are any higher than you would expect for a 300 game winner. Wagner's cards are relatively expensive because he is on most lists one of the top 5 players of all time.
__________________
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ He is available to do custom drawings in graphite, charcoal and other media. He also sells some of his works as note cards/greeting cards on Etsy under JamesSpaethArt. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
It seems like the rocketing sales prices for ruth rookie cards is driving up the price of other early ruth caramels.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with Peter's statment.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I think what ksabet is trying to ultimately get at, is that some players become overrated overall due to a "KEY" card.. A star, suddenly is thought of as a superstar. And sometimes a guy that would otherwise be common can become a household name, or at the very least a semi-star. In either case it would cause the player's cards in general to be somewhat over-valued..
OR sometimes people chase these "grails" only to ultimately settle for the next best thing, which drives up the demand and prices for that card, and occasionally things can snowball from there, usually no more than a card or two removed from the original grail.. To an extent, I can agree with this theory.. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
The Doyle is fairly tough to come by - I checked the PSA pop report and it confirmed this.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Yes the Plank and Wagner receive a slight premium, Plank more so.
Wagner was a great player, and his value is slightly lower than Cobb usually, as it should be. Plank isnt found in too many sets, so that helps in the value department too. No on Bengough, Lindstrom, Pafko, etc. The R319 Benny Bengough is just as common as every other low # card. its only got a premium in High Grade because the #1 card often received more wear when stored in number order, as many kids did back then. as a player Benny sucked! ... way below average player, averaging 41 games a year, with 0 HRs in his career, and only total 108 RBIs Last edited by fkw; 03-13-2012 at 07:49 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
A side question for curiousity sake.Does anyone have Wagnerin their top 5 all-time?
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vintage FOOTBALL Cards For Sale - Graded and Raw (1930's through 1990's) | Shouldabeena10 | Football Cards Forum | 2 | 09-24-2012 10:06 AM |
Vintage FOOTBALL Cards For Sale - Graded and Raw (1930's through 1990's) | Shouldabeena10 | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 1 | 12-17-2011 10:45 PM |
FS: 1972 Topps (204) Different Cards NM+ **SOLD** | Bunker | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 04-26-2011 10:03 PM |
Looking for people to write articles about certain cards | mmync | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-27-2010 05:59 PM |
Looking for people to write articles about certain cards. | mmync | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-27-2010 05:55 PM |