![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've recently started checking out the pop reports to help me understand the T206 set better. I was just on SGC looking up "Overall Hindu". They list 6 cards graded, but my 35 is not listed. This is kind of concerning as the difference between 6 and 7 graded is somewhat significant. And, if they missed my card, how many others might they have missed?
Does anyone have any idea as to how accurate these reports are?
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
have the designation on the flip? Because they started adding more and more information to the T206 flip over time. If yours just says "T206", then that's one reason it's not there as a SGC 5. You may need to send it back to be reholdered to get it listed as a Hindu back on the Pop report.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. Last edited by swarmee; 11-09-2014 at 02:38 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, it's the new holder a 35 (2.5) half-grade.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Luke, to answer your original question - the pop reports aren't even close.
Rick
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I know of several people who have said they will routinely crack cards out and resubmit them as many times as in necessary until they get the grade they desire. The scariest part is that it seemed to work in many cases. For me, I use pop reports only as a very loose guideline, and the longer I have collected, the less and less I care about their relevance. They are not accurate. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since a lot of cards get resubmited to a different company say SGC to Psa that would make it less sgc cards that they say they have graded. In other words say 10 card of a card are graded by sgc 5 are broken out and sent to Psa for grading and they have 15 already that would give Psa 20 and sgc 5 but we will never know
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not that accurate
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
HOFAutoRookies.com |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I find the Pop reports for SGC & PSA to be pretty accurate for T210, T211, and T213-1's. I have done a lot of research on these 3 groups and other than a little ambiguity from the sites, patterns can be discerned allowing you to understand scarcity and the like.
As for T206, I wouldn't touch that as it is out of my scope of collecting and honestly the information provided is probably better than having no information, so it does help to some degree depending on what you collect.
__________________
Collector of Nashville & Southern Memorabilia |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Best to all, Larry |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is the SMR accurate? | Matthew H | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 06-01-2010 07:55 PM |
How accurate are population reports? | wolterse | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 05-14-2010 06:48 AM |
How accurate is the PSA Registry? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 02-24-2008 06:06 PM |
PSA vs. SGC - consistent and accurate? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 02-09-2006 07:14 AM |
Accurate Vintage Stats: where to go? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-12-2003 04:20 PM |