Bvg thoughts???

[661fish]

I am over the inconsistencies with PSA. I know all about SGC. I recently have aquired a few 50's and 60's cards that are beautiful and are what they were graded. Any thoughts about BVG?

[bnorth]

If they are trimmed or sheet cut BVG is your answer. If not I would stick with PSA if selling. Beckett is mainly for new shiny cards. If they are for your personal collection go with whoever you like best.

EDIT: If you like SGC(I do) they are closed for an undetermined time now because of the hurricane. I got an email a little while ago.

[KMayUSA6060]

Are you asking about reputation for that era, slab value, or something else?

[CMIZ5290]

Your post is a bit confusing. Are you saying your cards are raw, or are they presently graded by Beckett?

[ngnichols]

Originally Posted by 661fish

I am over the inconsistencies with PSA. I know all about SGC. I recently have aquired a few 50's and 60's cards that are beautiful and are what they were graded. Any thoughts about BVG?

Andy Broome is their vintage guy and he worked at PSA as a grader at one time. I know from the vintage I've submitted to them the grades are accurate and/or maybe even slightly conservative.

I had a 1948 Leaf - Jackie Robinson that was a BVG 4.5 and every single person who saw the card said it looked at least a full point better than that.

Obviously with the inherent bias in the industry, you're not going to get maximum possible value for the card, but there is definitely inconsistency that exists with PSA and how they view certain aspects of cards - namely centering.

[661fish]

I don't care about resale. PSA had gone downhill imo.

[bnorth]

Originally Posted by 661fish

I don't care about resale. PSA had gone downhill imo.

Then put them in whatever slab you like the best. To me SGC looks the best and BVG are built the strongest.

[KMayUSA6060]

Originally Posted by bnorth

Then put them in whatever slab you like the best. To me SGC looks the best and BVG are built the strongest.

+1.

[CMIZ5290]

Originally Posted by 661fish

I don't care about resale. PSA had gone downhill imo.

You just lost me there...

[Dewey]

Originally Posted by CMIZ5290

You just lost me there...

Which part? I feel the same about the first part. Don't know enough about the second part.

[661fish]

In your guys opinion, does Beckett do a good job with vintage? That's what I was trying to get at?

[661fish]

Basically dies Beckett do a good job with vintage?

[herbc]

I've never had a problem with BVG. Have used all of them with similar results. If you're fed up with PSA, why not try something different.

[bobbyw8469]

Originally Posted by 661fish

I don't care about resale. PSA had gone downhill imo.

The market disagrees with you.

[Rich Klein]

Originally Posted by ngnichols

Andy Broome is their vintage guy and he worked at PSA as a grader at one time. I know from the vintage I've submitted to them the grades are accurate and/or maybe even slightly conservative.

I had a 1948 Leaf - Jackie Robinson that was a BVG 4.5 and every single person who saw the card said it looked at least a full point better than that.

Obviously with the inherent bias in the industry, you're not going to get maximum possible value for the card, but there is definitely inconsistency that exists with PSA and how they view certain aspects of cards - namely centering.

As far as I know, Andy never worked for PSA. I think he was working for a different TPG when he came to Beckett.

[Exhibitman]

Mixed bag.

Their holder is insane--Fort Knox compared to the others.

The card condom on every card can make it difficult to view and scan as compared to other services.

Grading is inconsistently consistent. They are less adverse to minor damage than PSA. A card with a corner ding that would get a 4 from PSA will get a 6-6.5 from BVG. The reality of the grade IMO is somewhere in between.

The subgrades for higher grade items are interesting in that they give you some idea of what the graders focused on.



The branding is very confusing. BVG, BCCG, and now BVA too.

The new black label for their pristine grade is nice idea



I am waiting for the one that goes to 11.

[drcy]

SCD Authentic had a grade of 11.

[swarmee]

PSA returns their fair share of "we don't grade this" or "we don't know what it is" or "it has to be a recognized variation somewhere else". BVG is good for what it is. But with the high bulk price and awful turnaround times on bulk orders, even the young kids are getting angry at the company and are shifting money towards PSA on modern cards.

[SMPEP]

Originally Posted by drcy

SCD Authentic had a grade of 11.

I thought that was only available in Belgium.

[granite75]

For vintage, BVG is the boxed wine of grading.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[iowadoc77]

Originally Posted by granite75

For vintage, BVG is the boxed wine of grading.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

This is funny! Do you mean boxed wine now or boxed wine Franzia? The newer brand Black Box actually makes a pretty good cabernet table wine that is pretty economical and while it can't compete with the more high dollar wines, it is much kinder on the wallet. But I do get your point

As far as the holders go, by a long long shot the strongest. Hard to crack those!

[Touch'EmAll]

Will admit I ruined a 1987 Fleer Larry Bird trying to get it out of a BVG holder. Will never try again. Thank godness wasn't a spendy card. A few years ago bought a BVG '51 Mays - came back from both PSA and SGC as trimmed.

[frankbmd]

Slabonomics

I have collected all four (PSA, SGC, BVG, GAI) types of slabs for over 10 years in prewar cards.

I have sold all four types of slabs as well. On average I have held cards for five years.

GAI - I only had 20 of these. Before selling any of them, I cracked and submitted them to SGC. They all graded, albeit a bit lower. I have sold half of them, but when they are all sold, I will be in the black easily, because I paid less for the GAIs to begin with.

BVG, SGC & PSA - have all netted me the same percentage ROI. BVGs are a bit cheaper than SGCs on the buy side, and therefore sell for a bit less on the sell side. Similarly SGCs are a bit cheaper than PSAs on the buy side, and therefore sell for a bit less on the sell side.

At least for me, slab diversity has had "no" economic consequences. I am a collector and not a dealer. I try not to overpay or oversell. I am not truly a buy the card not the holder type of guy though, because the holder and the grade do affect what I am willing to pay, and consequently what I am willing to sell for.

The disparity in slab pricing does increase "exponentially" in higher grade and lower pop cards. The effect of the PSA Registry on pricing of high end cards is very real, but in mid and lower graded cards, the difference is manageable for me.

So I buy cards that I like or want at reasonable prices, but never exclude a card from my consideration based on the type of slab. My OCD is focused not on a particular "look" or on a "Registry" position, but rather on a sustainable, yet changing, collection that will hopefully never result in red ink long term. Nor do I expect to become wealthy because of my cardboard.

Sorry, no punch line.

[Paul S]

Originally Posted by frankbmd

Sorry, no punch line.

Just when I think you're going to get through the whole post without a punchline, I get the non-punchline punchline. Dang!

[irv]

Originally Posted by 100backstroke

Will admit I ruined a 1987 Fleer Larry Bird trying to get it out of a BVG holder. Will never try again. Thank godness wasn't a spendy card. A few years ago bought a BVG '51 Mays - came back from both PSA and SGC as trimmed.

I followed this vid, from a member on here, and they were incredibly easy to crack open.

I only cracked them as I didn't like the looks of them in those plastic baggies.
I put them in sleeves and vintage top loaders and I am much happier now.
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=243539

[tschock]

Originally Posted by frankbmd

I have collected all four (PSA, SGC, BVG, GAI) types of slabs for over 10 years in prewar cards.

I have sold all four types of slabs as well.

Finally... someone who actually 'celebrates diversity'.

[glynparson]

Nice secure holder, great at catching counterfeits, terrible at finding alterations, terrible resale value, tough storage of holders. Not sure where the idea of PSA going down hill is coming from I think they have actually improved quiet a bit over the past several years. They are far more consistent than they used to be, though much tighter. BVG has graded far to many trimmed and or sheet cut cards (percentage wise) for me to ever have any faith in their grading abilities. In fact I think they suck as graders but they are good authenticators and there holders are secure as can be.

[Stampsfan]

Originally Posted by frankbmd

Slabonomics
I have collected all four (PSA, SGC, BVG, GAI) types of slabs for over 10 years in prewar cards.
...
I am a collector and not a dealer. I try not to overpay or oversell. I am not truly a buy the card not the holder type of guy though, because the holder and the grade do affect what I am willing to pay, and consequently what I am willing to sell for.
...
My OCD is focused not on a particular "look" or on a "Registry" position, but rather on a sustainable, yet changing, collection that will hopefully never result in red ink long term. Nor do I expect to become wealthy because of my cardboard.

Frank, I don't know you, but this is so well put, it makes me want to buy you a beer!! All of these quoted points resonate with me extremely well. Good job sir!!

[Jcfowler6]

I like cards and not the plastic they are in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk