![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ken McMillan
Hello, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)
Can you place the cards on top of each other and see if there is much/any difference in size. If so, which is wider and which is taller? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mike
Do these cards vary in size...I have a bunch and they all seem to vary slightly in size...not sure if they are trimmed or not...also, when you look at the T207's for sale, the borders on the cards are all over the place...any insight would be greatly appreciated. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob
Tinker is tougher to find in nice condition than Chance. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: B.C.Daniels
it would not re-grade on inspection a grade of "ex". |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ken McMillan
The cards are exactly the same size and do not have evidence of trimming. I purchased them from two different vendors about 10 years ago. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: paul s.
Neither of those cards has a bottom border. They are nice cards but I don't think they will grade as ex. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: mark
The bottoms do look cut, if they measure correctly PSA would label it (MC). I sold a PSA 4 t207 tinker last year from the nagy collection for $390.00. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ken McMillan
I will measure the cards before submitting them. I believe I read that the correct measurements should be 1 1/2 inch by 2 1/2 inches for these cards. Is this correct? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: mark
1 1/2 x 2 5/8, here is a link. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob
PSA may grade them MC but they may not. I have owned and seen a lot of Tinkers with very small or non-existent borders on the bottom so I don't think it is trimmed. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ken McMillan
here are some better scans of the cards |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
The Tinker might fetch 70-80, the Chance a little more. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: mark
Did you get a chance to check the size? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ken McMillan
they measured 1 7/16 inch by 2 5/8 inches. Both cards were identical dimensions and bought from 2 different dealers. interesting as there does not appear to be any evidenec for trimming. I guess the ultimate judge would be SCG of PSA. I like the cards anyway so even if they didn't grade out, no big deal. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T 207 brown backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-16-2009 06:44 PM |
trade my e90-1 Jennings for nearly any chance, evers, tinker, or brown | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 08-30-2008 08:37 AM |
Looking for Tinker, Evers, Chance and Brown T206 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 08-03-2007 04:57 PM |
E95 Mathewson, Cicotte, and Chance, M116 Mordecai Brown (Blue Background) | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 04-11-2007 06:27 PM |
Tinker, Evers, and Chance T206 cards for sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 07-25-2006 09:27 AM |