NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Buy/Sell/Trade Section (must login, caveat emptor) > T206 cards B/S/T

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2020, 02:35 PM
blametony's Avatar
blametony blametony is offline
Tony Ricciardi
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 339
Default PSA question

I have about 110 pre-war cards I'd like to submit to PSA for grading. My question is do you think the turnaround time would be quicker submitting under the 1959 and earlier quarterly special or the regular bulk submission? I know they'll both be several months, but do you think one would be any quicker than the other?

I wouldn't mind SGC, but I think they've become just as slow as PSA.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-18-2020, 03:38 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blametony View Post
I have about 110 pre-war cards I'd like to submit to PSA for grading. My question is do you think the turnaround time would be quicker submitting under the 1959 and earlier quarterly special or the regular bulk submission? I know they'll both be several months, but do you think one would be any quicker than the other?

I wouldn't mind SGC, but I think they've become just as slow as PSA.
I would submit under the quarterly special. It is cheaper, and the turnaround time is probably identical. Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-18-2020, 03:41 PM
Ryno447's Avatar
Ryno447 Ryno447 is offline
Ryan Sealock
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 180
Default

I’d go SGC. They’re a bit delayed, but nowhere near the delay of PSA. Plus for pre-war/vintage, I’d say it’s the preferred grader by many.

Got a recent SGC 20 day sub back in 20 days. I have 2 PSA subs going on 5 and 6 months that still aren’t done.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-18-2020, 05:00 PM
ZiggerZagger's Avatar
ZiggerZagger ZiggerZagger is offline
Jason B.
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 829
Default

So this is only my N of One, for what it's worth. Multiple submissions to PSA in the same package, documented received on 11/27/19.
The Bulk order (127 cards) popped 04/09/20 and the Monthly Special (38 Prewar cards) popped 04/15/20.

It's data at least, whatever it means...
|
__________________
|
Private collector, always looking to buy great cards from the good folks on Net54.
|
WTB: N162 Kelly & Anson (any PSA) | '15 Cracker Jack WaJo (PSA 2-4) | '32 U.S. Caramel Gehrig (PSA 3-5) | '33 Goudey Ruth #'s 53/144/149 (PSA 4-5).
T-206 Monster: 520/520 (PSA 4-6)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-18-2020, 09:37 PM
MailboxBaseball MailboxBaseball is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 253
Default

I personally prefer SGC much more than PSA for anything pre-1933.

PSA uses that mylar layer at their discretion which i think displays “not so well.” And for T206s they seem to use it a lot. I even offered to pay them to remove the mylar from my cards and they said no. So that was cool.

SGC has great customer service but i think they should stop changing their presentations/flips so often. I like the SGC flips with the smaller numbers much more.

Neither company is perfect, but i find dealing with SGC to be actually consistently enjoyable, and dealing with PSA to be consistently aggravating.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-18-2020, 09:38 PM
MailboxBaseball MailboxBaseball is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 253
Default

And no I dont work for SGC
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-19-2020, 05:34 AM
bksv99 bksv99 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 43
Default

I have to agree with Mailbox, SGC easier to deal with, and most customers, clients, collectors prefer it to PSA for pre war cards. Just my two cents
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hobby question bowman and topps question 1950 to 1953 Bigdah Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 9 12-20-2016 06:55 PM
1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 toppcat Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 9 01-03-2012 07:51 PM
S74(1) question Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 12-14-2006 10:18 AM
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 6 09-08-2006 12:36 AM
Player question & a set question Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 4 11-13-2004 06:41 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 PM.


ebay GSB