![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have about 110 pre-war cards I'd like to submit to PSA for grading. My question is do you think the turnaround time would be quicker submitting under the 1959 and earlier quarterly special or the regular bulk submission? I know they'll both be several months, but do you think one would be any quicker than the other?
I wouldn't mind SGC, but I think they've become just as slow as PSA. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’d go SGC. They’re a bit delayed, but nowhere near the delay of PSA. Plus for pre-war/vintage, I’d say it’s the preferred grader by many.
Got a recent SGC 20 day sub back in 20 days. I have 2 PSA subs going on 5 and 6 months that still aren’t done. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So this is only my N of One, for what it's worth. Multiple submissions to PSA in the same package, documented received on 11/27/19.
The Bulk order (127 cards) popped 04/09/20 and the Monthly Special (38 Prewar cards) popped 04/15/20. It's data at least, whatever it means... ![]() |
__________________
| Private collector, always looking to buy great cards from the good folks on Net54. | WTB: N162 Kelly & Anson (any PSA) | '15 Cracker Jack WaJo (PSA 2-4) | '32 U.S. Caramel Gehrig (PSA 3-5) | '33 Goudey Ruth #'s 53/144/149 (PSA 4-5). T-206 Monster: 520/520 (PSA 4-6) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I personally prefer SGC much more than PSA for anything pre-1933.
PSA uses that mylar layer at their discretion which i think displays “not so well.” And for T206s they seem to use it a lot. I even offered to pay them to remove the mylar from my cards and they said no. So that was cool. SGC has great customer service but i think they should stop changing their presentations/flips so often. I like the SGC flips with the smaller numbers much more. Neither company is perfect, but i find dealing with SGC to be actually consistently enjoyable, and dealing with PSA to be consistently aggravating. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And no I dont work for SGC
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have to agree with Mailbox, SGC easier to deal with, and most customers, clients, collectors prefer it to PSA for pre war cards. Just my two cents
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hobby question bowman and topps question 1950 to 1953 | Bigdah | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 12-20-2016 06:55 PM |
1955 Topps Trivia Question - Updated with Question #2 | toppcat | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-03-2012 07:51 PM |
S74(1) question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-14-2006 10:18 AM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
Player question & a set question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2004 06:41 PM |