![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey guys, I'm pretty psyched as this looks really nice and is my first submission to SGC. Should be getting the grades any day now. Will reveal grade as soon as I do. First person to post the correct grade wins... congratulations.
![]() Last edited by luciobar1980; 05-22-2018 at 08:38 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Dang that’s a beauty! I’d venture 8.5...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If anyone else submitted it, an 8 minimum. If I submit it, a 5.
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice finally seeing one w/o all the black print schmack. GL with the grade.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I will guess trimmed because that is what they would grade it if I sent it in.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Beautiful card!
NM+ 7.5 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5.5 or 6
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As pointed out in the first thread on the pre-war board, if that is a surface wrinkle on his cap, it wouldn't qualify for a 5.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With no surface wrinkles that is solid 8.5 and could get a 9.
If a surface wrinkle is visible under a black light then your looking at 5.5. As a collector, these are favorite cards b/c I can afford them. They look like and 8 or 9 with the naked eye. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I looked the card over pretty thoroughly so I feel like I would have seen any surface wrinkle, but who knows. We shall see! I’ll post the grade when I get it!
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Half grades do not get issued often. I believe the card grades at an 8, assuming no creases or wrinkles and the card measures correctly.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! Last edited by KCRfan1; 05-17-2018 at 10:24 AM. Reason: Spelling |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree. I am trying to imagine what would improve that card-- the flaws are miniscule. The area of concern for the surface wrinkle appears in some examples on ebay, at least to my eye, and therefore is likely just a printing anomaly.
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President. Last edited by nolemmings; 05-17-2018 at 10:52 AM. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, there are some touched corners as well, seen from the back. Centering is top notch, though.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sgc 84 is my guess
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼 |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
With the 'red raspberries' and print line going across...print defects.
Guessing a 7
__________________
1916-20 UNC Big Heads Need: Ping Bodie |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Rough cut on bottom, touches on corners, some minor print stuff on front.... 7
Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'll guess an 86 due to the light corner touches.
Very nice card regardless!
__________________
Current projects: White Sox prewar type set White Sox T206 Master set 1952 Topps set |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd expect an 84 from the looks of the scan and be happier if higher sad and reexamine if lower. Honestly a lot of print issues (which is common) on that copy ( i know its less than many but it still has them) very light touches to corners, rough cut is not a detractor for the grade so i like that it has a slight rough cut.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm just not seeing whatever you guys are seeing that would bring it down to a 7 based on corners.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What do we win???
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
K guys, any last guesses!? I should find out the grades tomorrow or next day, I hope.
Having seen it in hand, I think it is a real beauty and was thinking it could even be an 8 or better. I really only saw one slightly significant corner touch and the obvious rough factory cut. Speaking of which, how much weight do you reckon will SGC give to that? Personally it doesn't really bother me, assuming that it is indeed a factory cut, which I'm sure has to be. It almost gives it an even more raw, pristine-off-the machine look. Ok, that's maybe a stretch. ![]() Anyways, I'm gonna cross my fingers and guess an 88/8... |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
F it, I'll mail the first/closest correct guesser a few cool cards. No stinkers, promise!!
![]() |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
88
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
x
Last edited by luciobar1980; 05-21-2018 at 09:59 PM. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
82, but I hope it's higher.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sgc 84
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
K guys, got the grades this morning! Matt at SGC called me to authorize a higher charge because, the Yaz graded...
an 88/8!!! I’m psyched. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If Gashousegang declines or doesn’t get back to me, I’ll go to the next. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Excellent. As I posted, I had no idea what people going on about the corner wear were talking about. From what my old eyes could see there was no way those corners were two grades below Mint.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Very cool; guess that isn't a surface wrinkle, just a reflection.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Congrats
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not sure about SGC, but with PSA very light surface wrinkles on 5's are more common than you would think. I've seen plenty of them.
__________________
T206 Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It’s a beauty regardless of grade, but that is great news. Congrats! I’d be proud to have that one in my collection! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice!!! Sweet
Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sent you a PM, and congratulations on the grade!
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
8.0
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What was the higher charge for? Return shipping insurance?
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Awesome ! Congrats
__________________
Just a collector that likes to talk and read about the Hobby. 🤓👍🏼 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS 1960 Yastrzemski Rookie PSA 6 | polishman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 08-10-2017 12:22 AM |
Buying 1960 Yastrzemski and McCovey in PSA 7, 8 , and 9 | Sean1125 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 06-26-2016 08:12 PM |
Want to Buy - Carl Yastrzemski (1960's) | jbernar1 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 03-31-2016 10:40 PM |
WTB: 1960 Yastrzemski Rookie | KC Doughboy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 02-02-2014 12:42 PM |
WTB: 1960 Topps Yastrzemski PSA NM -NM/MT | MBMiller25 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-19-2011 11:38 AM |