![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Recently I picked up some cards that are a little nicer than the condition I usually buy in and was wondering if they're worth getting graded. McCovey had me especially curious because the only thing I see wrong with the card is the centering.
Below a couple examples. Looking at examples on ebay, the NM-MT or better examples are really easy to pick out, but that Excellent to Near Mint range seems to vary some and kind of has me stumped. Thanks for the help!
__________________
Current Sets: 1954 Topps Set: 71/250 |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
many added 8/20 1952 topps High #'s, Campos', ex+ singles EX Yanks team break | Republicaninmass | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 105 | 08-16-2016 12:34 PM |
Low Grade Pre-War Gems (Low Grade, High Eye Appeal) | MattyC | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 05-04-2014 07:49 AM |
Wanted: T206 mike powers in high grade, or nice grade with b. Hindu | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-06-2012 04:07 PM |
% of Low Grade vs. High Grade Trading Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 12-09-2007 07:16 AM |
Slightly O/T - Beckett Grade of Authentic vs. Number Grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-26-2006 09:05 PM |