 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-31-2013, 08:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Debating whether I should grade this
Picked this up this weekend and was curious if you guys that it was grading worthy. I know it's a common, but it's from a mid-1950s set, and if it will grade high enough then I think it will be worth it.
But that's the question. Will it grade high enough (8 or above) to make it worth it. The card is crease free upon inspection of both front and back. It is a piece of hair in the top loader near the hat. Thoughts?  
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wanted: T206 mike powers in high grade, or nice grade with b. Hindu | CMIZ5290 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-06-2012 04:07 PM |
| FSH: '62 Howard, hi-grade '54 Bowman, mid-grade '54 Topps | BIN at VCP | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 11-13-2010 10:32 AM |
| % of Low Grade vs. High Grade Trading Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 12-09-2007 07:16 AM |
| Slightly O/T - Beckett Grade of Authentic vs. Number Grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-26-2006 09:05 PM |
| Low grade to mid-grade 50s Topps sets desired | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-17-2006 05:41 PM |
Threaded Mode