![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In looking at the preview images, I noticed that the printer's scrap McGraw has part of four Piedmont backs. One cannot be identified, two are 350-460 subjects, but the bottom left looks to be either a 150 series design or has paper loss over the "3" yet aligns perfectly with the remaining three "backs". It also has no staining/ink just over the first number. My initial reaction is that part of the card might have been rebuilt but may also be surface paper loss; any thoughts?
I saw the card at the T206 resource site, btw. Judson Last edited by judsonhamlin; 03-22-2012 at 04:00 PM. Reason: Reexamined card at higher res; still not clear |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about the Topps T206 Sets | npa589 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 03-20-2011 10:41 AM |
19 PSA 6 T206 Southern Leaguers - Partners Wanted: REA Lot #275 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-02-2009 10:39 PM |
T206 Mitchell Miscut + McGraw with possible Factory Stamp? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 03-05-2008 08:50 AM |
T206 near set on REA - was it cheap? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 05-06-2006 07:41 AM |
T206 Ty Cobb Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-09-2002 12:21 PM |