![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Thanks to Brian M for starting a new poll. Many of those cards you just never see in high grade. .Ya'll go vote... it's a tough call........regards |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: caramelcard
Should be a 10-way tie. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Remember this is not a popularity vote. I have never seen a D303 in anything above a 5....however, I have seen a few real nice E107's. I was underbidder years ago on the Plank E107 in an 8 holder...... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Wesley
The PSA 8 Plank is an exceptional card. Out of 88 E107s PSA has graded, the Plank is the one and only 8. There are no 7s or even 6s. PSA has graded four 5s total. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tom Boblitt
Lections out there.........some of the issues I don't watch closely enough to have a real opinion on.....I've seen really nice E107's albeit few and far between........ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I don't have access to the pop reports. Does it say how many high grade D303's have been graded? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Prizner
What did the PSA 8 e107 Plank sell for? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
"darned if I know" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
The Plank E107 was around 18k plus juice...but this was 5 or more years ago...before they skyrocketed.....3 yrs ago decent HOF'ers were less than a thousand and then the **it hit the fan and the rest is history... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: robert a
T209, E100, and other minor league issues must've been printed on cheaper stock since they tend to have the same flaking around the borders which leads to the low grades. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian McQueen
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
I would put E98s in that list of tough sets in high grade. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
Leon, you calling me **it ? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brett
Just becaue PSA has only graded a few e107 PSA 5s and up doesn't mean thats all the 5+ out there. How many are graded by SGC ? How many are not even graded at all ? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
No, not this time ... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Peter Thomas
You are breaking my heart with the Plank. I bought the card raw @ 95 national and had it graded I though it would be a 7 but came back an 8. Never should have auctioned it. Still would like to know where it now resides. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Brian could have included E221 Bishops, which due to their size and paper content are almost always beat up. I remember having two beauties about 10 years ago, but most range poor to good. But they are currently unslabbable (is that a word?). |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: robert a
Brian, |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tom Boblitt
in our world, unslabbable is a word, but it doesn't sound pretty..... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Tom- I don't think Shakespeare ever used it, but I could be wrong. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bryan Long
I have seen my share of Lections and have yet to see a high grade example. Has any truth come to knowledge about how these were distributed? These cards are just beat all to heck. I would love to see a high grade one if anyone here has one to share. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: fkw
There is a EX-NRMT Lections Ruth floating around somewhere. I saw it about 3-4 years ago, but lost the picture. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lowe
I was thinking Zeenuts soon as I saw that Poll . Just chose it because I think it will be the next set to make a big jump in price . SOON . |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jon Canfield
Bryan, |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
simply because I don't recall ever seeing one that wasn't beat to hell. I've seen, as have we all, decent E107s. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Elliot
I was looking for e104's as a choice. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jon Canfield
Here are the Lections... The Schmidt is not deserving of the grade. I can't find a single thing wrong with it... should be an 80.. 70 minimum. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
I'd have to agree, e104-3s especially. I've had 6 of them, none grading better than a 30. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Kravitz
How about 1912 Garters or e125's? I think there are a ton of issues that are hard to find in decent quality. If I look that good after 100 years, I will be extremely pleased. BOO! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Poll at top- Defects..... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-01-2007 07:13 PM |
Another Poll | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-01-2006 12:59 AM |
new link at top of page | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 12-25-2005 06:29 PM |
The Poll | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-28-2002 01:14 AM |
The Poll........... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-10-2002 07:47 PM |