|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's a quick one for everyone;
Otis Crandall, which variation is scarcer? T crossed or T not crossed? T205resource lists crossed "T" as having nine backs and not crossed "T" as having only two backs. t205.org lists "t" crossed as being slightly higher in value. I was under the impression that generally speaking, the fewer backs that a card was available with the scarcer the card... Am I getting mixed up or what?!?
__________________
vg-g-f-p t205 set - 54/208 ml subset 4/12 variations - 3 hof'ers - 4 short prints - 3 different backs - 13 cards over $30 - 4
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| E90-1 confusion (for me, anyway) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-22-2007 02:47 PM |
| There seems to be a lot of confusion lately over terms | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-28-2005 01:51 PM |
| T206 Confusion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-22-2004 05:18 PM |
| SGC Confusion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-28-2004 10:00 AM |
| So there isn't confusion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-08-2004 01:33 PM |