![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Phil B
OK I'm bitter because I'm bailing out and am not going to get this card. But- does anyone find it strange that a PSA 2 with front paper loss and a pin hole qualifies for the half point bump? I bet I could submit thousands of cards to PSA under my name and never get a half point bump with paper loss and pin hole. I have to conclude that special treatment is given to known/friendly/bulk submitters. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bobby Binder
I just checked out the card and it does present very well even for its flaws. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
I was under the impression a pinhole meant PSA 1 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
If you can see the card and the flaws are clearly visible, why does it matter what number is on the plastic holder? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
That is a gorgeous card but with a legit bad technical grade. I thought the price was high but what eye appeal and great corners! Did the label have a number on it? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
I agree with you all. The card was nice looking and I bid based on the card and not the grade. But as to the matter of what qualifies a card for a half point bump (for those interested in grading) one would think that a pin hole and front paper loss do not get the bump- and certainly not for the average Joe submitter. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Kinserlow
Phil, |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
Come on guys, the pinhole doesn't matter near as much as who submitted it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rob D.
I'm sure it did receive a "bump" but isn't it possible that it was submitted raw just recently and received the (questionable) 2.5 on its first try? Had anyone seen this card previously graded? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: cmoking
nice looking card. if i was bidding on it, the number wouldn't matter too much to me. the people bidding on the card are probably not registry people, so don't blame it on them. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Phil B
Dan- I just want all pinholes treated fairly and equally |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Kinserlow
While the card presents really well, the hole bothers me from the grading aspect. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: quan
i think pinholes can go as high as a 2 these days. the plowboy chance had a pinhole and that got an sgc30 also...half grades are a joke imo so i usually just ignore the extra .5 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Kinserlow
Thanks, quan. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lajoie | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 02-18-2008 12:19 PM |
E90-1 Lajoie to Trade for E101-Bender-Tinker-Lajoie-Wagner | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-14-2008 10:44 PM |
Looking for T206 Crawford and Lajoie throwing, Lajoie with bat | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 12-09-2007 07:25 AM |
Does anyone know anything about this Lajoie card?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-22-2007 01:20 PM |
June Mastro Classic Collector Auction - NOT a Mastro bashing thread! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 07-19-2007 09:17 PM |