![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Mark Turner
why would psa give it a 5 and not state it as (OC). I do respect psa but they have to be more consistent on grading. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve M.
at some point PSA changed its grading scale and allowed that if you wanted they would grade a card at a lower grade rather than make the OC or MK qualifier. If this is one where the submitter made that election it would have been a 6 but for... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd Schultz
PSA will give a straight number wo/ qualifier for off center cards, but they will generally drop it two full grades. No way that card was an otherwise 7, so I think they just plain missed it. Also, it is my understanding that a mk qualifier is always included, even if PSA 1, as they consider that to be an alteration. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve M.
about PSA. Guess that's why I only use SGC. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff P
PSA's front centering tolerance for a PSA 5 is 85/15, this card falls within that range. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Beautiful 1888 Lawn Tennis Advertising Trade Card | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 03-29-2009 08:53 PM |
E102 Dooin.....SGC 40...beautiful card....2 hours left | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2008 09:12 AM |
One of the most beautiful cards I've ever seen | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 10-31-2005 09:26 AM |
We can't all be young and beautiful... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 04-18-2004 10:32 AM |
Beautiful E90-1 Mathewson card on e-bay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 06-20-2002 10:30 AM |