![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: raymond g. pasternak
I would appreciate your comment on a "ball park value" of this card. It was found in an house when some construction work was being done. It has very sharp corners and no loss of thickness. Its well centered with absolutely NO creases. However it is partially stained, I don't know what from. I am aware there are not that many GRADED D322 Wagners, nor many PSA 3! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Sean BH
Is that mold on the front? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Please don't take this as bashing your card but I am not sure how that got a 3. If the black mark is as dark as the scan shows then the card would be more appropriate in a 2 holder. A nice 3 would probably be about 8k-12k (give or take)....however I am going to say this one is about 3k-4k....again, if the black mark on his head is as dark as it looks to be.....Still a great find and a valuable card.....Hopefully this helps and we'll see what others say....I know I sold a nice 2 for about 5k a few years ago....but it was really pretty nice looking.....regards |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I agree except I think the eye appeal would really hurt the value. I have been wrong before though.... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: raymond g. pasternak
The scan is a bit distored. Its not as bad as it looks. The scan makes it look darker then it is. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Sean BH
Leon, |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Sean BH
Maybe it's a new Upper Deck relic card with original smog from Pittsburgh? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: raymond g. pasternak
Sean, |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jimmy
yes, beacuse of the staining under 5,000 - still a tough card, but Leon would know! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
Guys - I will certainly defer here as I have never either bought or sold this card, but I was tracking it in the last huggins and scott auction and this one: |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Matt and Ray, I've been looking for one of these for a while and have noticed a sharp uptick in sales prices. I find that generally a decent card graded Authentic can often sell for about the price of a 2 -- and that card that you posted Matt is decent but not a great Authentic due to the crease. A nice Tip Top Wagner 2 will go for a lot more than the 6K that the H & S card went for in my opinion, and I still think the H & S price is a bit high (obviously, just as the quality of a card graded 1 can be so wildly different, same as the quality of an Authentic card). |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: raymond g. pasternak
From my original post please compare this other one I have and advise which one would you then keep. Either the PSA 3 that is stained or the following one: |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
I'd keep the A -- and get a better scan of the 3! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joe D.
It all comes down to personal preferences I guess. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: raymond g. pasternak
Would you be interested in the PSA 3. Email me then. Its not as bad as the scan looks. And the card overall is in terrific shape. Nice corners, centered, and absolutely NO creases. rgprgp8618@comcast.net |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JK
I'd keep the A over the 3. The eye appeal is much nicer. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA vs. SCG -- Discount Valuation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 136 | 04-06-2008 06:42 AM |
Looking to downgrade D322 Wagner/E97 Keeler | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 01-25-2007 05:06 PM |
Looking for a Honus Wagner D322 and E90-2 cards | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 10-17-2006 07:30 PM |
added some stuff to my website D322 Wagner etc | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 01-15-2006 06:50 PM |
1910 D322 Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 03-29-2004 05:40 AM |