![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I recently picked up a Jay's Publishing Yankees photo set that I believe was issued in 1962 based on the players in the set. The reason I got it was because of the Kubek photo which wasn't in the 1962 set I had. When I got them, I noticed they are different from photos in the other 1962 set I have and from the other Yankees Jay sets I have. I have attached copies of the Mantle and Arroyo for comparison. The photos on the right are from the set I already had, the new photos are on the left.
Besides the slight cropping difference, I also noticed the difference in the fonts. Cropping differences are par for the course for different year sets, so maybe I'm wrong thinking these are both 1962. But the different font has me baffled. Has anyone seen other Jay Publishing sets with a similar, small font with the team name appearing to be in italics? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I was under the impression the Jay Publishing Photos were issued between 1958 and 1962, so that could be why there are different fonts on some of the cards.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I love this board. My response by email to Mike previously was, "Uhh, I think they are real." It's amazing how much people know and awesome how much they freely share on here.
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for the responses, but I still don't think we've got an answer.
Quote:
Quote:
The font in the pictures on the left in the original post are decidedly different from the other fonts. Is this a third font? Was this used after the first font, maybe got complaints, and changed again to the other more common font? If this is the case, it should appear in other team sets other than the Yankees, but only in the 1962 sets. So I was just curious if any other Jay set collectors, whether they be Yankees or another team, have photos with that font. I'm also curious as to the year of the set if it does have the different font. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
AustinMike,
I have Red Sox team photos from 1957-1962. I believe the 1957-1959 sets I have (mainly for Ted Williams) are likely Team Issue sets as these photos have ONLY the name of the player. They are still 5"x7" and the photo seems to match some later Jay Publishing cards, but I cannot confirm these should be called Jay Publishing Photos. These all have a block format (as noted in the first photo attached). In late 1959, (at least for the Red Sox), I can confirm Jay Publishing photos as the team name was added. With this, the font also changed. This was consistent from 1959-1961, and then as you noted, the font again changed again in 1962. I have studied the Pirates and Yankees Jay photos as well (Mantle and Clemente). The "true" Jay Publishing photos have fonts consistent with the Red Sox fonts that I have. I have to say, I have never seen the font on the photos that you have posted. Dave As a quick side note, the Mantle cropping on the 1957-1960 photos is ridiculous. The cropping of these can be easily missed if you are not looking carefully. Last edited by Harford20; 04-01-2016 at 08:56 AM. Reason: Add |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Dave, thanks for the input! It's interesting to see the difference in how other team sets were issued. I have Yankee photo sets without a team name, but they are team issued sets that are larger than the Jay photos. Is 1957 the first year that the Red Sox issued photo sets? I have a set of Yankees photos that I believe was issued in 1956 but I've also seen sets with the same photos listed on eBay with an issue date of 1955.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't have a scan(s) handy - I have had many Pirate team sets from 1956-1968. Painstakingly researched their year's. Can't contribute right now to op question, but can say the team photos existed from at least 1956. I believe also some of the real early ones - 1956, 57? May have only had the player name on them.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
AustinMike,
The Red Sox started Team issue photos in 1940. These can be found for nearly every year since that time (1940, 1941, 1942, 1943, 1946, 1947, 1948, 1949, 1950, 1952, 1953, 1954). These are "Red Sox Photo Packs" and look much different that the "Jay-type" photos. These were usually about 7" x9" in size and sepia tone. Again many of the photos were re-used from year to year. As far as I can find, the Red Sox did not do the Jay-type until 1957 (although it actually may have been late 1956 or pre-season 1957). I have not found much variation within the 1957 set (as for example, there are 4 different combinations of players in the actual 1960 Red Sox Jay Publishing photo packs, as players and even the manager changed in 1960). Below I have posted a 1941 and 1946 Ted from the Photo packs. Dave |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Harford20, gotcha. The Yankees also had team sets going back to at least the '40s. I only collect the Yankee team sets from 1951 and after, although the earliest I've found in this time period is a 1953 team issued set.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are three sets from 1962 Jay publishing that have the two font styles. As you know the Yankees are one with the Giants and Twins the others. I don't know the explanation for this smaller font .
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The owner of Jay Publishing perished in a plane crash in 1965. That is why the sets stop at that year
Rich
__________________
Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Someone needs to research and publish a comprehensive guide to team issues because there is a ton of confusion.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I totally agree!
__________________
M.!.c.h.@.3.L. . H.v.n.T _____________________________ Don't believe everything you think |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i own the Yankees and Twins. i have seen the Giants but the price the owner wanted ($250) was outrageous so I declined. As noted, the font for all three are identical and are not 1961's. The photos for the Twins and Giants are identical to the "regular font" sets of 1962.
To the best of my knowledge there are no other teams issued with this font variation. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
M.!.c.h.@.3.L. . H.v.n.T _____________________________ Don't believe everything you think |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bumping an old thread.
Are there any Jay collectors out there that can advise how the discern years of publication? I have a Johnny Antonelli player collection and I am trying to make heads or tails out of what I have and what I am missing. I have pulled down what is shown on TCDB and the 1955, 1956 Picture Pack 10 subjects, and 1956 Picture Pack 12 subjects appear identical. I downloaded the three images, cropped out the borders and created an animated GIF so you can see what I mean: ![]() There is an obvious change in darkness, but that could be an artifact of scanning rather than actual differences in the several issues. Is there a way to differentiate or do I just throw up my hands and say if I have one that I have them all? Last edited by carlsonjok; 06-30-2024 at 07:51 PM. Reason: Too many "differences" in the same sentence |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nothing against TCDB, but I know they once had an OPC card pictured as the Topps version, and it jumped out at me, because the cropping wasn't right. They ended up changing the listing with the right card pictured.
So, it is possible that three (or even two) of the photos are from the same set. Certainly not saying that's the case, but it is possible that they accidentally overlapped them.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From what I heard Jay's Publishing stopped making the photos because the owner died in a 1965 plane crash and that effectively ended the company.
Also remember that Manny's Baseball Land (across the street from Yankees Stadium and a major mail-order dealer) also made their own photo sets. The lists in Beckett and TCDB both came mainly from Jack Webster and IMHO you can take those lists to the bank as he (along with a few other dedicated collectors) were very detailed oriented. Regards Rich
__________________
Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's a further mind bender. If the three years of Jay Publishing photos were, in fact, exactly the same as each other, how would anyone know which year any example came from unless they actually had the unopened packaging in front of them?
Whoa!! Now I need to lie down.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If it doesn't give the name of the city then I believe it is not a "Jay Publishing" issue, but a Stadium Issued Photo. I thought Jay publishing started in 1958 and went thru 1965, all other years ( before and after) are considered stadium issued. Also Stadium photos were issued during 1958-1965 again with only the team name not city ( for example: Tigers vs Detroit Tigers ). There is also a different print or ( letter font) to tell the difference between the Jay Publishing photos from ( 1958-1961 ) Type 1 and Type 2 print for 1962-1965 ).
__________________
Wanted : Detroit Baseball Cards and Memorabilia ( from 19th Century Detroit Wolverines to Detroit Tigers Ty Cobb to Al Kaline). |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
At one point I compiled a montage of Mantle photos from the 1957 to 1960 Jay sets. Here it is: Jay's Mantles 1957 - 1960 shrunk.jpg As shown, there are various cropping differences between the different years. The first picture is from a 1957 25-photo set. The next is from a 1958 12-photo set. The next two are from 1958 World Series packs (a Yankees 12 photo pack and a Yankees-Braves 24 photo pack). The next two are from a 1959 All-Star pack and a 1959 12-photo Yankee team pack. The next two are from a 1960 All-Star pack and a 1960 12-photo Yankee team pack. I'm not sure about the date for the last one. So, even though the same photo is used each year, there are cropping differences. I think your best bet is to find someone who has all 3 years of the complete Giant photo packs. They can confirm whether TCDB has the correct photos for each year or whether there is a slight cropping difference between the years. Good luck!
__________________
M.!.c.h.@.3.L. . H.v.n.T _____________________________ Don't believe everything you think |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jay Publishing Photos | insidethewrapper | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 02-08-2016 01:42 PM |
Kashin Publishing Ruth Question | GasHouseGang | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-11-2015 06:56 AM |
wtb lincoln publishing A's pc | esd10 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 06-20-2012 11:53 AM |
US Publishing Co Postcard question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-09-2007 07:00 PM |
Mathewson E & S Publishing PC- FKW | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-05-2006 09:33 PM |