NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

View Poll Results: Horizontal mathewson vs Cracker Jack which has more value
E98 mathewson 3 3.09%
Horizontal mathewson 13 13.40%
Cracker Jack mathewson 76 78.35%
T205 cycle mathewson 5 5.15%
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2023, 12:51 PM
MR RAREBACK MR RAREBACK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: california
Posts: 596
Default E mathewson vs Cracker Jack mathewson

How can the 1914 Cracker Jack be worth so much more?
I see a lot of value in the horizontal pose, anyone else agree
Which card is undervalued/more upside
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 70B0485A-DDBE-419B-A706-053BDBFD8AD4.jpg (194.8 KB, 456 views)

Last edited by MR RAREBACK; 08-17-2023 at 01:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2023, 12:57 PM
cgjackson222's Avatar
cgjackson222 cgjackson222 is offline
Charles Jackson
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,887
Default

One of the poll choices is "Horizontal Mathewson". Is that like the E102?

Also, is this poll to determine which one people like more, or which one they think is more valuable?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2023, 01:01 PM
MR RAREBACK MR RAREBACK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: california
Posts: 596
Default

Your right I should of said which one is undervalued, or has more upside .
Hopefully will get a bunch of nice photos in the thread

Last edited by MR RAREBACK; 08-17-2023 at 01:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2023, 01:01 PM
Centauri Centauri is offline
Ben Morton
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 255
Default

Isn't the T205 Cycle Matty just a Cycle T205 - as in, all of them have the same backs?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2023, 01:05 PM
Casey2296's Avatar
Casey2296 Casey2296 is offline
Is Mudville so bad?
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: West Coast
Posts: 5,368
Default

-
Also a difference between 1914CJ horizontal Matty and 1915CJ Matty portrait.

Love the CJ and the Horizontal E-card both along with the E98.
-
Attached Images
File Type: jpg E98 Matty b.jpg (188.9 KB, 449 views)
__________________
Phil Lewis


https://www.flickr.com/photos/183872512@N04/
-
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2023, 01:19 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 33,534
Default

You need to redo the poll to be meaningful, as pointed out world of difference between the two CJs. Which one are you asking about?

That pic may explain why I can never seem to buy an E Mathewson.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions.

My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/

Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 08-17-2023 at 01:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-17-2023, 01:23 PM
Rhotchkiss's Avatar
Rhotchkiss Rhotchkiss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 4,544
Default

There is a huge difference between Matty's 1914 and 1915 Cracker Jacks (although I think both are more valuable than the other options).

Its not even a question that the 1914 CJ is a ton more valuable than any of the options. The 1914 CJ is a top 10+/- prewar card (as far being iconic) and an authentic sells for $30k+, with a 3+ easily selling for six figures. Thus, I assume you mean the 1915 CJ, which I think is more valuable than the other options
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2023, 01:29 PM
darwinbulldog's Avatar
darwinbulldog darwinbulldog is offline
Glenn
Glen.n Sch.ey-d
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MR RAREBACK View Post
How can the 1914 Cracker Jack be worth so much more?
I see a lot of value in the horizontal pose, anyone else agree
Which card is undervalued/more upside
There's a reason there isn't a photo of 23 1914 CJ Mathewsons.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-17-2023, 03:04 PM
DeanH3's Avatar
DeanH3 DeanH3 is offline
D/e/@/n H/@/c/k/e/t/t
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,077
Default

I've been looking to add an e92, e101 or e102 Matty. Having said that I'd rank them.

'14 Cracker Jack - Iconic card from iconic set
E98 - Overall tougher to locate than E92 family. BSF did not add to the pop explosion like other subjects.
E92 family - To me, the best looking of the three.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-17-2023, 03:14 PM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is offline
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 33,534
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanH3 View Post
I've been looking to add an e92, e101 or e102 Matty. Having said that I'd rank them.

'14 Cracker Jack - Iconic card from iconic set
E98 - Overall tougher to locate than E92 family. BSF did not add to the pop explosion like other subjects.
E92 family - To me, the best looking of the three.
LOL I was on like a 10 year quest myself. Lost out, or the card was too out of register, every single time.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions.

My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-17-2023, 03:21 PM
MR RAREBACK MR RAREBACK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: california
Posts: 596
Default

If you add up the population on all the e92 and crofts candy e101 e102 e105 e106 d303 and t216 its not as many as you would think
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-17-2023, 03:24 PM
mrreality68's Avatar
mrreality68 mrreality68 is offline
Jeffrey Kuhr
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,957
Default

I think the 1914 CJ more upside (even the prices already risen a lot past several years)

It is Iconic, it is considered a top pre-war card, it has relatively low population (I know others have low counts also but not iconic)
__________________
Thanks all

Jeff Kuhr

https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/

Looking for
1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards
1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose
1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth
1921 Frederick Foto Ruth
Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards
Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards
1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson
1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson
1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-17-2023, 03:53 PM
Casey2296's Avatar
Casey2296 Casey2296 is offline
Is Mudville so bad?
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: West Coast
Posts: 5,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MR RAREBACK View Post
If you add up the population on all the e92 and crofts candy e101 e102 e105 e106 d303 and t216 its not as many as you would think
Ha! That's because you have them all.
-
I was fortunate to pick this one up on BST, thank you Andrew. It is one of my favorite cards and probably my favorite Matty image.
-
Attached Images
File Type: jpg E101 Matty.jpg (191.9 KB, 401 views)
__________________
Phil Lewis


https://www.flickr.com/photos/183872512@N04/
-
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-17-2023, 04:06 PM
MR RAREBACK MR RAREBACK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: california
Posts: 596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrreality68 View Post
I think the 1914 CJ more upside (even the prices already risen a lot past several years)

It is Iconic, it is considered a top pre-war card, it has relatively low population (I know others have low counts also but not iconic)
But could the e92 mathewson card ever become iconic
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-17-2023, 04:21 PM
refz's Avatar
refz refz is offline
Danny Gr|mes
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Waterbury, Conn.
Posts: 697
Default

I voted for the horizontal E series Matty. Close second I like the E93. They are all great regardless
__________________
Successful Transactions:
Leon, Ted Z, Calvindog, milkit1, thromdog, dougscats, Brian Van Horn, nicedocter, greenmonster66, megalimey, G1911
(I’m sure I’m missing some quality members)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-17-2023, 05:53 PM
conor912's Avatar
conor912 conor912 is offline
C0nor D0na.hue
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,270
Default

CJ all day, every day, and twice on Sunday.
__________________
Items for sale or trade here UPDATED 3-16-18
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-17-2023, 06:32 PM
Yoda Yoda is offline
Joh.n Spen.cer
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,206
Default

No wonder you believe the Matty horizontal (no red lips, please) has a lot of value. You control the market
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-17-2023, 06:41 PM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is offline
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,491
Default

I’m partial to the e93 at the moment as this is my nicest Matty currently. I have always liked the e98 pose but have never owned one. The horizontal has never appealed to me for some reason. cracker jacks are next level, especially the horizontal.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1940.jpg (174.1 KB, 355 views)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-17-2023, 07:20 PM
ajjohnsonsoxfan ajjohnsonsoxfan is offline
A.J. Johnson
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,490
Default

14 CJ Matty all day

I owned this one. (anyone here own it now?)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Mathewson88psa1front.jpg (203.3 KB, 334 views)
__________________
Join my Cracker Jack group on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/crac...rdsmarketplace
https://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/ajohnson39
*Proudest hobby accomplishment: finished (and retired) the 1914 Cracker Jack set currently ranked #12 all-time
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-17-2023, 07:53 PM
Danny Smith Danny Smith is offline
Danny Smith
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO / Washington, DC
Posts: 538
Default

How many Matty mello mints do you have?
__________________
e105 Mello Mint Set Want List (45/50):
1) Chase
2) Cobb
3) Crawford
4) Magee
5) O'Hara

N172 Want List (all poses and variations)
1) Phenomenal Smith
2) Chicken Wolf
3) Frank Genins / Genius
4) STL Browns Champions Portraits
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-17-2023, 07:59 PM
MR RAREBACK MR RAREBACK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: california
Posts: 596
Default

None wish I had one
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-18-2023, 02:47 AM
x2drich2000 x2drich2000 is offline
(DJ) Rich.ard.s
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,252
Default

As others have mentioned, there is a big difference between the 1914 and 1915 Cracker Jack. Likewise, there is also a big difference between all the different versions of the E-horizontal Mathewson. There are quite a few versions that are way more difficult than the 1914 Cracker Jack. Those varities I think may have more of an upside, at least as a percentage. If someone is just looking for the front though, they can easily pick from the E92 Dockman/E101/E102/E106. Those I don't see appreciating as much.

Aesthetically, I never cared for the 1914 Cracker Jack so it is really far down my list of cards I'd want and I wouldn't pay anywhere near what they sell for even if I could afford it. IMO, it is really not that rare and it is overvalued now. I would much more prefer the 1915 or E-horizontal or E93 or E90-1 or E103 or ...
__________________
Current Wantlist:
E92 Nadja - Bescher, Chance, Cobb, Donovan, Doolan, Dougherty, Doyle (with bat), Lobert, Mathewson, Miller (fielding), Tinker, Wagner (throwing), Zimmerman
E/T Young Backrun - Need E90-1
E92 Red Crofts - Anyone especially Barry and Shean
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-18-2023, 04:14 AM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MR RAREBACK View Post
How can the 1914 Cracker Jack be worth so much more?
I see a lot of value in the horizontal pose, anyone else agree
Which card is undervalued/more upside
Why is the 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle worth more than his 1951 Bowman rookie card? Or his other second year cards like the 1952 Bowman?

The 1914 Cracker Jack set is one of the most iconic sets in the hobby. The Mathewson is one of the key cards in the set. The demand far outweighs the supply. His card is going to keep rising.

The other E cards or the t205 cycle are much lower demand. They will continue to grow at a slower pace. Value from a scarcity point just doesn't happen in this hobby. Baseball card prices are demand driven. That is the 1914 CJ Matty.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-18-2023, 07:00 AM
cgjackson222's Avatar
cgjackson222 cgjackson222 is offline
Charles Jackson
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by x2drich2000 View Post
As others have mentioned, there is a big difference between the 1914 and 1915 Cracker Jack. Likewise, there is also a big difference between all the different versions of the E-horizontal Mathewson. There are quite a few versions that are way more difficult than the 1914 Cracker Jack. Those varities I think may have more of an upside, at least as a percentage. If someone is just looking for the front though, they can easily pick from the E92 Dockman/E101/E102/E106. Those I don't see appreciating as much.

Aesthetically, I never cared for the 1914 Cracker Jack so it is really far down my list of cards I'd want and I wouldn't pay anywhere near what they sell for even if I could afford it. IMO, it is really not that rare and it is overvalued now. I would much more prefer the 1915 or E-horizontal or E93 or E90-1 or E103 or ...

I prefer the aesthetics of the horizontal E101, E102, etc Mathewson over the 1914 Cracker Jack. But it is hard to argue that the '14 Cracker Jack is not a rare card. PSA has graded 28 and SGC has graded 27.

PSA has graded 42 Mathewson Dockman & Sons E92s, 13 Mathewson E92 Crofts Candy, 5 Mathewson Crofts Cocoa E92s, 1 Mathewson Nadja Caramel E92, 30 Mathewson E101s, 51 Mathewson E102s, 4 Mathewson E105s, 6 Mathewson T216s, 1 Mathewson D303 Mother's Bread, 16 Mathewson E106s.

So that's a total of (at least) 167 horizontal E/D Mathewsons graded by PSA alone.

Last edited by cgjackson222; 08-18-2023 at 07:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-19-2023, 10:17 AM
CobbSpikedMe's Avatar
CobbSpikedMe CobbSpikedMe is offline
Andrew Hunt00n
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Belle Mead, NJ
Posts: 2,278
Default

I'm an E98 guy so I'm partial to that one. Then I really like the E horizontal pose a lot as well. My order of most desired would be this same order; the E98, then the E horizontal pose, then the CJ.



.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg E98 Mathewson.JPG (41.7 KB, 157 views)
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar.

The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here
My Online Trading Site: Click Here
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com
My Humble Blog: Click Here
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-22-2023, 08:23 AM
brianp-beme's Avatar
brianp-beme brianp-beme is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,501
Default

I believe this is an instance where a Net54 user ID should logically be changed to:

"MrToughforOtherstoComebyMattyFronts"

I am usually not much help when assessing value/undervalued status, but here roughly is my aesthetic ranking of Matty E-cards, based on memory..
I may have forgotten an issue or two...does Matty have a E300 Plows Candy card? If so, it would probably rank near the top):

E-hoeizontal issues (E92, E101, E102, E105...but not E106, which I believe is the set that has the excessive coloration issues mentioned previously).

E107 ( kinda in its own time frame category)

E103

E93

E-Unc Orange Borders

1915 Cracker Jacks

E95 (not much mention about this one)

E98

E95

1914 Cracker Jacks

E90-1

E91A

E91B

E-unc All-Star cards? (I had to put something below my belovingly maligned E91 cards)

Brian (and excuse me if I have misinterpreted how fetching your favorite Matty is in my ranking)

Last edited by brianp-beme; 08-23-2023 at 12:55 AM. Reason: Added in E103
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB 1914 Cracker Jack Mathewson Blunder19 Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T 0 11-15-2021 08:49 PM
WTB - D304 and/or Cracker Jack Mathewson cguidi Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T 3 02-13-2014 09:28 AM
1915 Cracker Jack Mathewson PSA 7 Archive Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T 0 09-21-2008 09:01 PM
1914 Cracker Jack Mathewson Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 11-13-2003 08:43 AM
1914 Cracker Jack Mathewson Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 8 01-23-2002 11:31 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:55 PM.


ebay GSB