![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok, after my wife asking me many times to come up with a list, and an acceptable price to pay, I am doing so. But, I need some input. In my pre war wants the desired grade would be a 6 or equivalent and a 7 in post war. However, I am satisfied with many lower grades as well and was wondering what everyone thought the approximate values should be. So if pre war baseline is 6, what % should a 5 be of the 6 price? How about a 4?
If 7 is the post war target, what percentage should a 6 or a 5 be? I know the answers will not apply unilaterally due to the tremendous amount of variables, just looking for a reasonable assumption. Mark Medlin
__________________
You got any of them n series non sport and boxing in there? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I think, for the most part, it is a moving target and is therefore hard to put an exact number/% on. I noticed tonight this "8" Mays card and another copy in a "6". The "8" sold for 10X what the 6 did so is a Mays 7 only 5X? http://www.ebay.com/itm/401150210217...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT http://www.ebay.com/itm/351777911285...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Really, for 1950s-70s Topps, it's an exponential increase as you move up towards 10.
Say a card is a $1 1956 common, raw. Maybe something like this: PSA 1: $1 PSA 2: $2 PSA 3: $3 PSA 4: $5 PSA 5: $8 PSA 6: $12 PSA 7: $20 PSA 8: $35 PSA 9: $75 PSA 10: $250 Is that what you're looking for? 1933 Goudey would probably be the same way, but all the values would be 5x since a common is $5 raw at least?
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Mark, For T206 commons, as a rule of thumb, if a 6 is 1.0 then a 5 is about 0.6 and a 4 is about 0.3. Again, this is just rough and ready based on sales the last couple of years. Scot
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you for your posts. I appreciate you all trying to help me with this.
__________________
You got any of them n series non sport and boxing in there? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
One rule of thumb I used to follow was to take the price at a given grade then multiply by .65 or .70 to get the next lowest grade. So if a 7 is $1000, a 6 would be about $650-$700. This is only a guide and not a perfect formula.
This does not always hold true for certain cards or issues that see a huge jump from 7 to 8, or 8 to 9, etc. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think your wife asks too many difficult questions. We may need to involve Frank for a final ruling on this one.
God help us all! 😭 Tom C |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You rang?
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't really see how there can be a multiplier that can be applied across all sets. Even in postwar, there's a lot of variation. Callahans were sold as sets and the most common grade is an 8, so a seven should be a bit cheaper than normal. 1950 Drakes are pretty tough in anything over a 6.
Individual cards within a set can be harder to find in nice condition too, so I might pay more for those in a lower grade. In prewar, the same stuff happens. There's a few T206 commons I've bought for more than the grade would seem to deserve because the front/series combination isn't common. Some sets I'd be very happy to find any card at a price I could afford. What I do is make a rough comparison to recent sales on Ebay. That sort of gives me the going rate for a particular card or typical common. Steve B |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A late reply but one nonetheless, it seems a 7 will be double or more what a 6 is, and you can do that, and more, going up each grade. Each series is different though and the registry folks drive the high end prices (*and some investors/collectors). I have always thought the grade of 6 to be a great bang for the buck.
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just tell her to involve you in the decision so she doesn't get screwed. Honestly. Giving her a guide may be good, it may help her surprise you, but it's worse to hear she got taken and paid way too much for what she purchased for you.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CBC News story comparing Canadian home prices to baseball cards valuations | byrone | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-15-2015 03:29 PM |
t206.org valuations? | camlov2 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 12-07-2012 03:35 PM |
Help With T205 Valuations | KODIAK | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-20-2012 12:29 PM |
The percentages finally caught up with me | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 01-18-2005 02:48 PM |