![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
An example sold last night in Sterling for $3,828. It looks like it went through a washing machine and dryer cycle:
![]() This seems to have become a card that certain collectors are willing to fork over huge money to own in any condition, and one that has reached the point where the average collector is unable to afford one. I cannot believe that this trend can continue, because unlike the T206 Wagner, Plank or similar cards, there are a heck of a lot of these available. Your thoughts?
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are over 2,000 graded 1952 Mantle cards listed on the registries.
But from my perspective ... makes more sense to spend big money on the Mantle ... than it does for a PSA 10 card (of anyone) from the 1970s. So if people are willing to spend a ridiculous price (forget the exact number but over $1,000 at the least) for a PSA 10 1973 Art Shell card, then I think the value of teh mantle is safe from several years to come. Of course now that I give this forcast ... the price will crash! Patrick |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It is well centered though
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think baby boomers drive the market on this card. Once that generation starts to pass away, you will not have anyone who actually collected in that era or watched Mantle play. Therefore I think the demand will slow.
As a Gen-Xer, I love the card, it's been iconic since I started collecting in the 70's. However, if I had the disposable income to purchase one, I think I'd pass unless the deal was so good that I could flip it for a decent profit. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I see your point. I would venture to say that there are a lot more '52 Mantle's out there than Cobb and Wagner.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll just say this, I can think of A LOT better items to spend nearly $4,000 on than that faded piece of worn out, destroyed, scrap garbage
![]() To answer your question, I don't see how the trend CAN'T continue......there's obviously no shortage of really, really "intelligent" people out there with too much money in their hands that are willing to pay $4,000 for scrap examples such as this when the card is actually so common and plentiful. Well over 2,000 examples......and that's just the graded ones! Haha. Doesn't even include all the raw specimens out there (probably actually closer to 3,000). It would be like the Griffey Jr. UD rookie fetching $100,000 20 years from now. I know seems so silly.....that's what everybody first thought in the early to mid 80's when the Mantle prices first started getting stupid. Last edited by HappyJack41; 02-06-2015 at 09:49 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's exactly my point, Roy. With thousands of these cards out there, no issue of scarcity exists, just demand.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This may be heresy to say, but I don't think the card looks THAT horrible. The color is nice, the centering is great, and it does show a picture of the Mick!
__________________
Thanks, Jason Collecting interests and want lists at https://jasoncards.wordpress.com/201...nd-want-lists/ |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is another force as work besides potentially decreased demand for Mantles relative to other cardboard. We should see the available supply creep up as well as boomers...brace yourself...die and their Mantles they never wanted to part with end up with with their kids who are anxious to liquidate. Still, I see prices going up for another 15 years before they go down at all.
__________________
Thanks, Jason Collecting interests and want lists at https://jasoncards.wordpress.com/201...nd-want-lists/ |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I guess I'll throw my hat into the discussion.
I don't mean to disrespect the buyer at all, as I am sure they are happy with their purchase. But I just couldn't pull the trigger on that card. Someday I will own a '52 Topps Mantle. And it will be in the lower grade, probably no higher than a PSA 2 or so. But there are so many examples of the same card in a PSA 1-2 that have much better eye appeal. Yes, they would command more than the $3,825 it cost to acquire this card, but wouldn't it be worth it? This PSA 1 was recently sold on eBay by PWCC for $6,600. Yes, it's a lot more than what was paid for the one being discussed. But look at the difference in appearance. ![]() I would much rather have this one because, well, it looks like a '52 Topps Mantle. The other one was run through the wash, and I don't want a card merely to say I own it. I want a card I could enjoy, and this one, with the higher price tag, would make me happy. I know the centering is off (sorry, Matt ![]()
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wtt 1952 topps mickey mantle sgc auth for same card in slightly better condition | 25801wv | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-27-2012 08:49 PM |
(2) 1952 Topps Commons in GD Condition For Sale | Lee17 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-13-2012 11:57 PM |
Wts: 1956 topps mantle nm+ condition | CMIZ5290 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 11-29-2011 12:44 PM |
How much do you guys think this 52 Topps Mantle is worth?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-21-2008 09:03 PM |
WANTED: 1952 Topps in really bad condition in order to complete set | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 6 | 04-11-2008 05:04 AM |